Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12620
DC FieldValue
dc.titleRegulating Over-indebtedness: Local State Power in Cambodia's Microfinance Market
dc.contributor.authorGreen, W Nathan
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-15T07:40:39Z
dc.date.available2021-07-15T07:40:39Z
dc.date.issued2020-10-21
dc.identifier.citationGreen, W Nathan (2020-10-21). Regulating Over-indebtedness: Local State Power in Cambodia's Microfinance Market. DEVELOPMENT AND CHANGE 51 (6) : 1429-1453. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12620
dc.identifier.issn0012155X
dc.identifier.issn14677660
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/194233
dc.description.abstractCambodian microfinance borrowers are suffering from an over-indebtedness crisis. In the past 20 years, the Cambodian government has implemented financial reforms that have commercialized the microfinance sector and promoted industry self-regulation. Echoing long-standing concerns about neoliberal microfinance, critics maintain that these reforms have hollowed out the Cambodian state's ability to regulate a highly competitive market, thereby exacerbating the problem of over-indebtedness. In contrast, based upon 20 months of ethnographic research in southern Cambodia by the author, this article argues that the microfinance market would not function without local authorities performing key regulatory roles of the state. These local authorities include commune councillors — elected representatives of multiple villages — who work closely with village leaders and local police. They are the primary state actors who enforce the property rights and loan contracts upon which Cambodia's microfinance market depends. The author analyses how this local state regulation contributes to household indebtedness by encouraging multiple borrowing, rural out-migration and land repossession. The article advances development studies scholarship on over-indebtedness by demonstrating that the inequitable outcomes of neoliberal microfinance can be better understood, and contested, by interrogating the multi-scalar spaces of state regulatory power.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWILEY
dc.sourceElements
dc.subjectSocial Sciences
dc.subjectDevelopment Studies
dc.subjectNEOLIBERALISM
dc.subjectMICROCREDIT
dc.subjectDECENTRALIZATION
dc.subjectPARTICIPATION
dc.subjectLAND
dc.subjectDEBT
dc.typeArticle
dc.date.updated2021-07-15T07:02:15Z
dc.contributor.departmentGEOGRAPHY
dc.description.doi10.1111/dech.12620
dc.description.sourcetitleDEVELOPMENT AND CHANGE
dc.description.volume51
dc.description.issue6
dc.description.page1429-1453
dc.published.statePublished
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
Green - 2020 - Regulating over-indebtedness.pdf235.99 kBAdobe PDF

CLOSED

Published

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.