Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings10100174
DC FieldValue
dc.titleHumans-as-a-Sensor for Buildings-Intensive Longitudinal Indoor Comfort Models
dc.contributor.authorJayathissa, Prageeth
dc.contributor.authorQuintana, Matias
dc.contributor.authorAbdelrahman, Mahmoud
dc.contributor.authorMiller, Clayton
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-15T05:52:02Z
dc.date.available2021-04-15T05:52:02Z
dc.date.issued2020-10-01
dc.identifier.citationJayathissa, Prageeth, Quintana, Matias, Abdelrahman, Mahmoud, Miller, Clayton (2020-10-01). Humans-as-a-Sensor for Buildings-Intensive Longitudinal Indoor Comfort Models. BUILDINGS 10 (10). ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings10100174
dc.identifier.issn20755309
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/189366
dc.description.abstractEvaluating and optimising human comfort within the built environment is challenging due to the large number of physiological, psychological and environmental variables that affect occupant comfort preference. Human perception could be helpful to capture these disparate phenomena and interpreting their impact; the challenge is collecting spatially and temporally diverse subjective feedback in a scalable way. This paper presents a methodology to collect intensive longitudinal subjective feedback of comfort-based preference using micro ecological momentary assessments on a smartwatch platform. An experiment with 30 occupants over two weeks produced 4378 field-based surveys for thermal, noise, and acoustic preference. The occupants and the spaces in which they left feedback were then clustered according to these preference tendencies. These groups were used to create different feature sets with combinations of environmental and physiological variables, for use in a multi-class classification task. These classification models were trained on a feature set that was developed from time-series attributes, environmental and near-body sensors, heart rate, and the historical preferences of both the individual and the comfort group assigned. The most accurate model had multi-class classification F1 micro scores of 64%, 80% and 86% for thermal, light, and noise preference, respectively. The discussion outlines how these models can enhance comfort preference prediction when supplementing data from installed sensors. The approach presented prompts reflection on how the building analysis community evaluates, controls, and designs indoor environments through balancing the measurement of variables with occupant preferences in an intensive longitudinal way.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMDPI
dc.sourceElements
dc.subjectIndoor environmental quality
dc.subjectThermal comfort models
dc.subjectPersonalised comfort model
dc.subjectMachine learning
dc.subjectEcological momentary assessment
dc.subjectOccupant-centric
dc.subjectOccupant behaviour
dc.typeArticle
dc.date.updated2021-04-15T02:36:00Z
dc.contributor.departmentBUILDING
dc.description.doi10.3390/buildings10100174
dc.description.sourcetitleBUILDINGS
dc.description.volume10
dc.description.issue10
dc.published.statePublished
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
2007.02014v2.pdfAccepted version5.84 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

Post-printView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.