Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A1449
DC FieldValue
dc.titleResponse and progression-free survival in oropharynx squamous cell carcinoma assessed by pretreatment perfusion CT: Comparison with tumor volume measurements
dc.contributor.authorBisdas, S
dc.contributor.authorRumboldt, Z
dc.contributor.authorWagenblast, J
dc.contributor.authorBaghi, M
dc.contributor.authorKoh, T.S
dc.contributor.authorHambek, M
dc.contributor.authorVogl, T.J
dc.contributor.authorMack, M.G
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-23T09:01:36Z
dc.date.available2020-11-23T09:01:36Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.citationBisdas, S, Rumboldt, Z, Wagenblast, J, Baghi, M, Koh, T.S, Hambek, M, Vogl, T.J, Mack, M.G (2009). Response and progression-free survival in oropharynx squamous cell carcinoma assessed by pretreatment perfusion CT: Comparison with tumor volume measurements. American Journal of Neuroradiology 30 (4) : 793-799. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A1449
dc.identifier.issn0195-6108
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/183919
dc.description.abstractBackground and Purpose: Perfusion CT (PCT) provides a rapid, reliable, and non-invasive technique for assessing tumor vascularity. The purpose of this study was to assess whether pretreatment dynamic perfusion CT (PCT) may predict response to induction chemotherapy and midterm progression-free survival (PFS) in advanced oropharynx squamous cell carcinoma (SCCA) and to compare the results with those derived by tumor volume measurements. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nineteen patients underwent routine contrast-enhanced CT (CECT), pretreatment PCT, and conventional endoscopy. Tumor response was determined according to radiologic (RECIST) criteria. The PCT parameters, tumor volume, radiologic response, and PFS were analyzed with use of Cox-proportional hazards model, receiver operating characteristic (ROC), and Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results: The baseline blood flow (BF), blood volume (BV), and permeability surface area product (PS) were significantly higher, whereas mean transit time (MTT) was significantly lower in the responders than in the nonresponders (P < .002). BV showed 100% sensitivity, MTT and PS had the highest specificity (100%), and BF showed 84.2% sensitivity and 66.7% specificity for prediction of tumor response after induction chemotherapy. The pretreatment tumor volume correlated with PFS in the pooled patients group (r = 0.4; P < .0001), whereas postinduction tumor volume correlated significantly with PFS in the responders and nonresponders (r = 0.22-0.64; P < .006). Pretreatment tumor volume (P = .0001) and BF (P = .001) were significant predictors for PFS. Conclusions: Pretreatment PCT parameters may predict response after induction chemotherapy. Tumor volume and BF values may predict PFS in patients with advanced oropharyngeal SCCA.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Neuroradiology
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceUnpaywall 20201031
dc.subjectcisplatin
dc.subjectdocetaxel
dc.subjectfluorouracil
dc.subjectiodinated contrast medium
dc.subjectadult
dc.subjectaged
dc.subjectarticle
dc.subjectblood flow
dc.subjectblood volume
dc.subjectcancer chemotherapy
dc.subjectcancer combination chemotherapy
dc.subjectcancer radiotherapy
dc.subjectcancer surgery
dc.subjectclinical article
dc.subjectcomparative study
dc.subjectcomputer assisted tomography
dc.subjectcontinuous infusion
dc.subjectcontrolled study
dc.subjectendoscopy
dc.subjectfemale
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectmale
dc.subjectmultiple cycle treatment
dc.subjectoropharynx carcinoma
dc.subjectperfusion computed tomography
dc.subjectprogression free survival
dc.subjectsensitivity and specificity
dc.subjectsquamous cell carcinoma
dc.subjecttumor volume
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
dc.subjectBlood Flow Velocity
dc.subjectBlood Volume
dc.subjectCarcinoma, Squamous Cell
dc.subjectContrast Media
dc.subjectDisease Progression
dc.subjectEndoscopy
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectFollow-Up Studies
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectKaplan-Meiers Estimate
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectNeoplasm Recurrence, Local
dc.subjectOropharyngeal Neoplasms
dc.subjectPredictive Value of Tests
dc.subjectProportional Hazards Models
dc.subjectProspective Studies
dc.subjectROC Curve
dc.subjectSensitivity and Specificity
dc.subjectSurvival Rate
dc.subjectTomography, X-Ray Computed
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentDUKE-NUS MEDICAL SCHOOL
dc.description.doi10.3174/ajnr.A1449
dc.description.sourcetitleAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology
dc.description.volume30
dc.description.issue4
dc.description.page793-799
dc.published.statepublished
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_3174_ajnr_A1449.pdf377.35 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons