Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/148501
DC FieldValue
dc.titleComparative myocardial deformation in 3 myocardial layers in mice by speckle tracking echocardiography
dc.contributor.authorTee, N
dc.contributor.authorGu, Y
dc.contributor.authorMurni
dc.contributor.authorShim, W
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-17T08:56:14Z
dc.date.available2020-11-17T08:56:14Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationTee, N, Gu, Y, Murni, Shim, W (2015). Comparative myocardial deformation in 3 myocardial layers in mice by speckle tracking echocardiography. BioMed Research International 2015 : 148501. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/148501
dc.identifier.issn23146133
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/183618
dc.description.abstractBackground. Speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) using dedicated high-resolution ultrasound is a relatively new technique that is useful in assessing myocardial deformation in 3 myocardial layers in small animals. However, comparative studies of STE parameters acquired from murine are limited. Methods. A high-resolution rodent ultrasound machine (VSI Vevo 2100) and a clinically validated ultrasound machine (GE Vivid 7) were used to consecutively acquire echocardiography images from standardized parasternal long axis and short axis at midpapillary muscle level from 13 BALB/c mice. Speckle tracking strain (longitudinal, circumferential, and radial) from endocardial, myocardial, and epicardial layers was analyzed using vendor-specific offline analysis software. Results. Intersystem differences were not statistically significant in the global peak longitudinal strain (-16.8 ± 1.7% versus -18.7 ± 3.1%) and radial strain (46.8 ± 14.2% versus 41.0 ± 9.5%), except in the global peak circumferential strain (-16.9 ± 3.1% versus 27.0 ± 5.2%, P<0.05). This was corroborated by Bland Altman analysis that revealed a weak agreement in circumferential strain (mean bias ± 1.96 SD of -10.12 ± 6.06%) between endocardium and midmyocardium. However, a good agreement was observed in longitudinal strain between midmyocardium/endocardium (mean bias ± 1.96 SD of -1.88 ± 3.93%) and between midmyocardium/epicardium (mean bias ± 1.96 SD of 3.63 ± 3.91%). Radial strain (mean bias ± 1.96 SD of -5.84 ± 17.70%) had wide limits of agreement between the two systems that indicated an increased variability. Conclusions. Our study shows that there is good reproducibility and agreement in longitudinal deformation of the 3 myocardial layers between the two ultrasound systems. Directional deformation gradients at endocardium, myocardium, and epicardium observed in mice were consistent to those reported in human subjects, thus attesting the clinical relevance of STE findings in murine cardiovascular disease models. Copyright © 2015 Nicole Tee et al.
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceUnpaywall 20201031
dc.subjectanimal experiment
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectcontrolled study
dc.subjectechocardiography
dc.subjectelectrocardiography monitoring
dc.subjectendocardium
dc.subjectepicardium
dc.subjectheart left ventricle ejection fraction
dc.subjectheart muscle
dc.subjectmale
dc.subjectmouse
dc.subjectnonhuman
dc.subjectpulse wave
dc.subjectreal time ultrasound scanner
dc.subjectspeckle tracking echocardiography
dc.subjectultrasound transducer
dc.subjectanimal
dc.subjectanisotropy
dc.subjectBagg albino mouse
dc.subjectcomparative study
dc.subjectcomputer assisted diagnosis
dc.subjectechocardiography
dc.subjectelastography
dc.subjecthardness
dc.subjectheart
dc.subjectmechanical stress
dc.subjectphysiology
dc.subjectprocedures
dc.subjectreproducibility
dc.subjectsensitivity and specificity
dc.subjecttensile strength
dc.subjectYoung modulus
dc.subjectAnimalia
dc.subjectMurinae
dc.subjectMus
dc.subjectRodentia
dc.subjectAnimals
dc.subjectAnisotropy
dc.subjectEchocardiography
dc.subjectElastic Modulus
dc.subjectElasticity Imaging Techniques
dc.subjectHardness
dc.subjectHeart
dc.subjectImage Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMice
dc.subjectMice, Inbred BALB C
dc.subjectReproducibility of Results
dc.subjectSensitivity and Specificity
dc.subjectStress, Mechanical
dc.subjectTensile Strength
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentDUKE-NUS MEDICAL SCHOOL
dc.description.doi10.1155/2015/148501
dc.description.sourcetitleBioMed Research International
dc.description.volume2015
dc.description.page148501
dc.published.statePublished
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1155_2015_148501.pdf3.89 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons