Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20020269
DC FieldValue
dc.titleSevoflurane, propofol and carvedilol block myocardial protection by limb remote ischemic preconditioning
dc.contributor.authorCho, Y.J
dc.contributor.authorNam, K
dc.contributor.authorKim, T.K
dc.contributor.authorChoi, S.W
dc.contributor.authorKim, S.J
dc.contributor.authorHausenloy, D.J
dc.contributor.authorJeon, Y
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-10T00:48:08Z
dc.date.available2020-11-10T00:48:08Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationCho, Y.J, Nam, K, Kim, T.K, Choi, S.W, Kim, S.J, Hausenloy, D.J, Jeon, Y (2019). Sevoflurane, propofol and carvedilol block myocardial protection by limb remote ischemic preconditioning. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 20 (2) : 269. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20020269
dc.identifier.issn16616596
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/183295
dc.description.abstractThe effects of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) in cardiac surgery have been inconsistent. We investigated whether anesthesia or beta-blockers interfere with RIPC cardioprotection. Fifty patients undergoing cardiac surgery were randomized to receive limb RIPC (four cycles of 5-min of upper arm cuff inflation/deflation) in the awake state (no-anesthesia; n = 17), or under sevoflurane (n = 17) or propofol (n = 16) anesthesia. In a separate crossover study, 11 healthy volunteers received either carvedilol or no medication prior to RIPC. Plasma dialysates were obtained and perfused through an isolated male Sprague–Dawley rat heart subjected to 30-min ischemia/60-min reperfusion, following which myocardial infarct (MI) size was determined. In the cardiac surgery study, pre-RIPC MI sizes were similar among the groups (39.7 ± 4.5% no-anesthesia, 38.9 ± 5.3% sevoflurane, and 38.6 ± 3.6% propofol). However, post-RIPC MI size was reduced in the no-anesthesia group (27.5 ± 8.0%; p < 0.001), but not in the anesthesia groups (35.7 ± 6.9% sevoflurane and 35.8 ± 5.8% propofol). In the healthy volunteer study, there was a reduction in MI size with RIPC in the no-carvedilol group (41.7 ± 4.3% to 30.6 ± 8.5%; p < 0.0001), but not in the carvedilol group (41.0 ± 4.0% to 39.6 ± 5.6%; p = 0.452). We found that the cardioprotective effects of limb RIPC were abolished under propofol or sevoflurane anesthesia and in the presence of carvedilol therapy. © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceUnpaywall 20201031
dc.subjectacetylsalicylic acid
dc.subjectangiotensin receptor antagonist
dc.subjectantidiabetic agent
dc.subjectbeta adrenergic receptor blocking agent
dc.subjectcaffeine
dc.subjectcalcium channel blocking agent
dc.subjectcarvedilol
dc.subjectclopidogrel
dc.subjectdigoxin
dc.subjectdipeptidyl carboxypeptidase inhibitor
dc.subjectdiuretic agent
dc.subjectglyceryl trinitrate
dc.subjectheparin
dc.subjecthydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor
dc.subjectinsulin
dc.subjectmidazolam
dc.subjectpropofol
dc.subjectremifentanil
dc.subjectsevoflurane
dc.subjectsojourn
dc.subjecttroponin
dc.subjectcarvedilol
dc.subjectpropofol
dc.subjectsevoflurane
dc.subjectacute heart infarction
dc.subjectadrenergic system
dc.subjectadult
dc.subjectanimal experiment
dc.subjectanimal model
dc.subjectarteriovenous fistula
dc.subjectartery injury
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectbispectral index
dc.subjectblood pressure monitoring
dc.subjectbody mass
dc.subjectbody surface
dc.subjectcannulation
dc.subjectcontinuous infusion
dc.subjectcontrolled study
dc.subjectcoronary artery bypass graft
dc.subjectdialysate level
dc.subjectelectrocardiogram
dc.subjectestimated glomerular filtration rate
dc.subjectexercise
dc.subjectfemale
dc.subjectheart function
dc.subjectheart infarction prevention
dc.subjectheart left ventricle ejection fraction
dc.subjectheart muscle contractility
dc.subjectheart perfusion
dc.subjectheart protection
dc.subjectheart surgery
dc.subjectheart ventricle fibrillation
dc.subjecthematocrit
dc.subjecthemodialysis
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjecthuman experiment
dc.subjectischemic preconditioning
dc.subjectisolated heart
dc.subjectlimit of detection
dc.subjectlimit of quantitation
dc.subjectmale
dc.subjectmiddle aged
dc.subjectnonhuman
dc.subjectnormal human
dc.subjectparasympathetic nerve cell
dc.subjectpercutaneous coronary intervention
dc.subjectpulse oximetry
dc.subjectrat
dc.subjectretrospective study
dc.subjectsingle drug dose
dc.subjectyoung adult
dc.subjectaged
dc.subjectanimal
dc.subjectcase control study
dc.subjectcrossover procedure
dc.subjectdisease model
dc.subjectheart infarction
dc.subjectlimb
dc.subjectprocedures
dc.subjectrandomization
dc.subjectSprague Dawley rat
dc.subjectvascularization
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectAnimals
dc.subjectCardiac Surgical Procedures
dc.subjectCarvedilol
dc.subjectCase-Control Studies
dc.subjectCross-Over Studies
dc.subjectDisease Models, Animal
dc.subjectExtremities
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectIschemic Preconditioning
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectMyocardial Infarction
dc.subjectPropofol
dc.subjectRandom Allocation
dc.subjectRats
dc.subjectRats, Sprague-Dawley
dc.subjectSevoflurane
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentDUKE-NUS MEDICAL SCHOOL
dc.description.doi10.3390/ijms20020269
dc.description.sourcetitleInternational Journal of Molecular Sciences
dc.description.volume20
dc.description.issue2
dc.description.page269
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_3390_ijms20020269.pdf2.94 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons