Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1186/1750-1172-8-124
DC FieldValue
dc.titleSystematic review of available evidence on 11 high-priced inpatient orphan drugs
dc.contributor.authorKanters, T.A
dc.contributor.authorDe Sonneville-Koedoot, C
dc.contributor.authorRedekop, W.K
dc.contributor.authorHakkaart, L
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-28T07:19:30Z
dc.date.available2020-10-28T07:19:30Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationKanters, T.A, De Sonneville-Koedoot, C, Redekop, W.K, Hakkaart, L (2013). Systematic review of available evidence on 11 high-priced inpatient orphan drugs. Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases 8 (1) : 124. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1186/1750-1172-8-124
dc.identifier.issn17501172
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/181805
dc.description.abstractBackground: Attention for Evidence Based Medicine (EBM) is growing, but evidence for orphan drugs is argued to be limited and inferior. This study systematically reviews the available evidence on clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and budget impact for orphan drugs. Methods. A systematic review was performed in PubMed, Embase, NHS EED and HTA databases for 11 inpatient orphan drugs listed on the Dutch policy rule on orphan drugs. For included studies, we determined the type of study and various study characteristics. Results: A total of 338 studies met all inclusion criteria. Almost all studies (96%) focused on clinical effectiveness of the drug. Of these studies, most studies were case studies (41%) or observational studies (39%). However, for all orphan diseases at least one experimental or quasi-experimental study was found, and a randomized clinical trial was available for 60% of the orphan drugs. Eight studies described the cost-effectiveness of an orphan drug; an equal number described an orphan drug's budget impact. Conclusions: Despite the often heard claim that RCTs are not feasible for orphan drugs, we found that an RCT was available in 60% of orphan drugs investigated. Cost-effectiveness and budget impact analyses for orphan drugs are seldom published. © 2013 Kanters et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceUnpaywall 20201031
dc.subjectagalsidase alfa
dc.subjectagalsidase beta
dc.subjectalemtuzumab
dc.subjectcanakinumab
dc.subjectclofarabine
dc.subjecteculizumab
dc.subjectfludarabine
dc.subjectgalsulfase
dc.subjectiduronate 2 sulfatase
dc.subjectlaronidase
dc.subjectofatumumab
dc.subjectorphan drug
dc.subjectrecombinant glucan 1,4 alpha glucosidase
dc.subjecttrabectedin
dc.subjectacute lymphoblastic leukemia
dc.subjectarticle
dc.subjectcase study
dc.subjectchronic lymphatic leukemia
dc.subjectCINCA syndrome
dc.subjectclinical effectiveness
dc.subjectcost effectiveness analysis
dc.subjectcost utility analysis
dc.subjectdrug approval
dc.subjectdrug cost
dc.subjectevidence based medicine
dc.subjectFabry disease
dc.subjecthospital patient
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectmucopolysaccharidosis
dc.subjectobservational study
dc.subjectparoxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria
dc.subjectquality adjusted life year
dc.subjectquasi experimental study
dc.subjectsoft tissue sarcoma
dc.subjectsystematic review
dc.subjectcost benefit analysis
dc.subjectdrug manufacture
dc.subjecteconomics
dc.subjectNetherlands
dc.subjectrandomized controlled trial (topic)
dc.subjectRare Diseases
dc.subjectstandards
dc.subjectCost-Benefit Analysis
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectInpatients
dc.subjectNetherlands
dc.subjectOrphan Drug Production
dc.subjectRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic
dc.subjectRare Diseases
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentSAW SWEE HOCK SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
dc.description.doi10.1186/1750-1172-8-124
dc.description.sourcetitleOrphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
dc.description.volume8
dc.description.issue1
dc.description.page124
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1186_1750-1172-8-124.pdf326.69 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons