Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-014-0337-1
DC FieldValue
dc.titleThe images of psychiatry scale: Development, factor structure, and reliability
dc.contributor.authorStuart, H
dc.contributor.authorSartorius, N
dc.contributor.authorLiinamaa, T
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-27T11:02:16Z
dc.date.available2020-10-27T11:02:16Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationStuart, H, Sartorius, N, Liinamaa, T (2014). The images of psychiatry scale: Development, factor structure, and reliability. BMC Psychiatry 14 (1) : 337. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-014-0337-1
dc.identifier.issn1471244X
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/181473
dc.description.abstractBackground: This analysis is based on a survey questionnaire designed to describe medical educators' views of psychiatry and psychiatrists. Our goals in this paper were to assess the psychometric properties of the survey questions by (a) using exploratory factor analysis to identify the basic factor structure underlying 37 survey items; (b) testing the resulting factor structure using confirmatory factor analysis; and (c) assessing the internal reliability of each identified factor. To our knowledge, this is the first attempt to use these techniques to psychometrically assess a scale measuring the strength of stigma that medical educators attached to psychiatry. Methods: Survey data were collected from a random sample of 1,059 teaching faculty in 23 academic teaching sites in 15 countries. We conducted exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis to identify the scale structure and Cronbach's alpha to assess internal consistency of the resulting scales. Results: Results showed that a two-factor solution was the best fit for the data. Following exploratory factor analysis, we conducted confirmatory factor analysis on a split half of the sample. Results highlighted several items with low loadings. Excluding factors with low correlations and allowing for several correlated variances resulted in a good fitting model explaining 95% of the variance in the data. Conclusions: We identified two unidimensional scales. The Images Scale contained 11 items measuring stereotypic content concerning psychiatry and psychiatrists. The Efficacy of Psychiatry Scale contained 5 items addressing perceptions of the challenges and effectiveness of psychiatry as a discipline. © Stuart et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceUnpaywall 20201031
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectfemale
dc.subjecthealth personnel attitude
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectknowledge
dc.subjectmajor clinical study
dc.subjectmale
dc.subjectperception
dc.subjectpsychiatrist
dc.subjectpsychiatry
dc.subjectpsychometry
dc.subjectquestionnaire
dc.subjectreliability
dc.subjectstigma
dc.subjectcontrolled study
dc.subjectfactorial analysis
dc.subjecthealth personnel attitude
dc.subjectinternational cooperation
dc.subjectprocedures
dc.subjectpsychiatry
dc.subjectpsychometry
dc.subjectrandomized controlled trial
dc.subjectreproducibility
dc.subjectstandards
dc.subjectstatistics and numerical data
dc.subjectAttitude of Health Personnel
dc.subjectFactor Analysis, Statistical
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectInternationality
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectPsychiatry
dc.subjectPsychometrics
dc.subjectReproducibility of Results
dc.subjectSurveys and Questionnaires
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentDUKE-NUS MEDICAL SCHOOL
dc.description.doi10.1186/s12888-014-0337-1
dc.description.sourcetitleBMC Psychiatry
dc.description.volume14
dc.description.issue1
dc.description.page337
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1186_s12888-014-0337-1.pdf461.45 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons