Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-015-0845-8
DC FieldValue
dc.titleGenetic relatedness and risk factor analysis of ampicillin-resistant and high-level gentamicin-resistant enterococci causing bloodstream infections in Tanzanian children
dc.contributor.authorAamodt, H
dc.contributor.authorMohn, S.C
dc.contributor.authorMaselle, S
dc.contributor.authorManji, K.P
dc.contributor.authorWillems, R
dc.contributor.authorJureen, R
dc.contributor.authorLangeland, N
dc.contributor.authorBlomberg, B
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-27T10:50:44Z
dc.date.available2020-10-27T10:50:44Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationAamodt, H, Mohn, S.C, Maselle, S, Manji, K.P, Willems, R, Jureen, R, Langeland, N, Blomberg, B (2015). Genetic relatedness and risk factor analysis of ampicillin-resistant and high-level gentamicin-resistant enterococci causing bloodstream infections in Tanzanian children. BMC Infectious Diseases 15 (1) : 107. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-015-0845-8
dc.identifier.issn14712334
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/181412
dc.description.abstractBackground: While enterococci resistant to multiple antimicrobials are spreading in hospitals worldwide, causing urinary tract, wound and bloodstream infections, there is little published data on these infections from Africa. Methods: We assessed the prevalence, susceptibility patterns, clinical outcome and genetic relatedness of enterococcal isolates causing bloodstream infections in children in a tertiary hospital in Tanzania, as part of a prospective cohort study of bloodstream infections among 1828 febrile children admitted consecutively from August 2001 to August 2002. Results: Enterococcal bacteraemia was identified in 2.1% (39/1828) of admissions, and in 15.3% (39/255) of cases of culture-confirmed bloodstream infections. The case-fatality rate in children with Enterococcus faecalis septicaemia (28.6%, 4/14) was not significantly different from those with Enterococcus faecium septicaemia (6.7%, 1/15, p = 0.12). E. faecium isolates commonly had combined ampicillin-resistance and high-level gentamicin resistance (HLGR), (9/17), while E. faecalis frequently displayed HLGR (6/15), but were ampicillin susceptible. None of the tested enterococcal isolates displayed vancomycin resistance by Etest or PCR for vanA and vanB genes. Multi-locus sequence-typing (MLST) showed that the majority of E. faecium (7/12) belonged to the hospital associated Bayesian Analysis of Population Structure (BAPS) group 3-3. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) indicated close genetic relationship particularly among E. faecium isolates, but also among E. faecalis isolates. There was also correlation between BAPS group and PFGE results. Risk factors for enterococcal bloodstream infection in univariate analysis were hospital-acquired infection and clinical diagnosis of sepsis with unknown focus. In multivariate analysis, neonates in general were relatively protected from enterococcal infection, while both prematurity and clinical sepsis were risk factors. Malnutrition was a risk factor for enterococcal bloodstream infection among HIV negative children. Conclusion: This is the first study to describe bloodstream infections caused by ampicillin-resistant HLGR E. faecium and HLGR E. faecalis in Tanzania. The isolates of E. faecium and E. faecalis, respectively, showed high degrees of relatedness by genotyping using PFGE. The commonly used treatment regimens at the hospital are insufficient for infections caused by these microbes. The study results call for increased access to microbiological diagnostics to guide rational antibiotic use in Tanzania. © 2015 Aamodt et al.; licensee BioMed Central.
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceUnpaywall 20201031
dc.subjectampicillin
dc.subjectgentamicin
dc.subjectvancomycin
dc.subjectampicillin
dc.subjectgentamicin
dc.subjectantibiotic resistance
dc.subjectantibiotic sensitivity
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectbacteremia
dc.subjectbacterium isolate
dc.subjectchild
dc.subjectcohort analysis
dc.subjectenterococcal infection
dc.subjectEnterococcus faecalis
dc.subjectEnterococcus faecium
dc.subjectfatality
dc.subjectfemale
dc.subjectfever
dc.subjectgenetic similarity
dc.subjectgenotype
dc.subjecthospital infection
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectHuman immunodeficiency virus infection
dc.subjectinfant
dc.subjectinfection risk
dc.subjectinfection sensitivity
dc.subjectmajor clinical study
dc.subjectmale
dc.subjectmalnutrition
dc.subjectmultilocus sequence typing
dc.subjectnewborn
dc.subjectprematurity
dc.subjectprevalence
dc.subjectprospective study
dc.subjectpulsed field gel electrophoresis
dc.subjectTanzania
dc.subjectantibiotic resistance
dc.subjectbacteremia
dc.subjectblood
dc.subjectclassification
dc.subjectcross infection
dc.subjectEnterococcus
dc.subjectEnterococcus faecalis
dc.subjectEnterococcus faecium
dc.subjectepidemiology
dc.subjectgenetics
dc.subjectGram-Positive Bacterial Infections
dc.subjectisolation and purification
dc.subjectmicrobiology
dc.subjectpenicillin resistance
dc.subjectpreschool child
dc.subjectrisk factor
dc.subjectAmpicillin
dc.subjectAmpicillin Resistance
dc.subjectBacteremia
dc.subjectChild
dc.subjectChild, Preschool
dc.subjectCohort Studies
dc.subjectCross Infection
dc.subjectDrug Resistance, Microbial
dc.subjectEnterococcus
dc.subjectEnterococcus faecalis
dc.subjectEnterococcus faecium
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectGenotype
dc.subjectGentamicins
dc.subjectGram-Positive Bacterial Infections
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectInfant
dc.subjectInfant, Newborn
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectRisk Factors
dc.subjectTanzania
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentPATHOLOGY
dc.description.doi10.1186/s12879-015-0845-8
dc.description.sourcetitleBMC Infectious Diseases
dc.description.volume15
dc.description.issue1
dc.description.page107
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1186_s12879-015-0845-8.pdf785.9 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons