Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-016-1606-z
DC FieldValue
dc.titleEpidemic resurgence of dengue fever in Singapore in 2013-2014: A virological and entomological perspective
dc.contributor.authorHapuarachchi, H.C
dc.contributor.authorKoo, C
dc.contributor.authorRajarethinam, J
dc.contributor.authorChong, C.-S
dc.contributor.authorLin, C
dc.contributor.authorYap, G
dc.contributor.authorLiu, L
dc.contributor.authorLai, Y.-L
dc.contributor.authorOoi, P.L
dc.contributor.authorCutter, J
dc.contributor.authorNg, L.-C
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-27T10:41:36Z
dc.date.available2020-10-27T10:41:36Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationHapuarachchi, H.C, Koo, C, Rajarethinam, J, Chong, C.-S, Lin, C, Yap, G, Liu, L, Lai, Y.-L, Ooi, P.L, Cutter, J, Ng, L.-C (2016). Epidemic resurgence of dengue fever in Singapore in 2013-2014: A virological and entomological perspective. BMC Infectious Diseases 16 (1) : 300. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-016-1606-z
dc.identifier.issn14712334
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/181361
dc.description.abstractBackground: Dengue resurged in Singapore during 2013-14, causing an outbreak with unprecedented number of cases in the country. In the present study, we summarise the epidemiological, virological and entomological findings gathered through the dengue surveillance programme and highlight the drivers of the epidemic. We also describe how the surveillance system facilitated the preparedness to moderate epidemic transmission of dengue in the country. Methods: The case surveillance was based on a mandatory notification system that requires all medical practitioners to report clinically-suspected and laboratory-confirmed cases within 24 hours. The circulating Dengue virus (DENV) populations were monitored through an island wide virus surveillance programme aimed at determining the serotypes and genotypes of circulating virus strains. Entomological surveillance included adult Aedes surveillance as well as premise checks for larval breeding. Results: A switch in the dominant serotype from DENV-2 to DENV-1 in March 2013 signalled a potential spike in cases, and the alert was corroborated by an increase in average Aedes house index. The alert triggered preparedness and early response to moderate the impending outbreak. The two-year outbreak led to 22,170 cases in 2013 and 18,338 in 2014, corresponding to an incidence rate of 410.6 and 335.0 per 100,000 population, respectively. DENV-1 was the dominant serotype in 2013 (61.7 %, n = 5,071) and 2014 (79.2 %, n = 5,226), contributed largely by a newly-introduced DENV-1 genotype III strain. The percentage of houses with Ae. aegypti breeding increased significantly (p < 0.001) from 2012 (annual average of 0.07 %) to 2013 (annual average of 0.14 %), followed by a drop in 2014 (annual average of 0.10 %). Aedes breeding data further showed a wide spread distribution of Ae. aegypti in the country that corresponded with the dengue case distribution pattern in 2013 and 2014. The adult Aedes data from 34 gravitrap sentinel sites revealed that approximately 1/3 of the monitored sites remained at high risk of DENV transmission in 2013. Conclusions: The culmination of the latest epidemic is likely to be due to a number of demographic, social, virological, entomological, immunological, climatic and ecological factors that contribute to DENV transmission. A multi-pronged approach backed by the epidemiological, virological and entomological understanding paved way to moderate the case burden through an integrated vector management approach. © 2016 Hapuarachchi et al.
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceUnpaywall 20201031
dc.subjectAedes aegypti
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectbiological monitoring
dc.subjectbreeding
dc.subjectdengue
dc.subjectDengue virus 1
dc.subjectDengue virus 2
dc.subjectdisease severity
dc.subjectdisease surveillance
dc.subjectepidemic
dc.subjectgenotype
dc.subjecthealth program
dc.subjecthigh risk population
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectimago
dc.subjectincidence
dc.subjectinfection risk
dc.subjectisland (geological)
dc.subjectlaboratory test
dc.subjectlarval development
dc.subjectnonhuman
dc.subjectphysician
dc.subjectpopulation research
dc.subjectpublic health service
dc.subjectserotype
dc.subjectSingapore
dc.subjectspecies distribution
dc.subjectvirology
dc.subjectvirus strain
dc.subjectvirus transmission
dc.subjectzoology
dc.subjectadult
dc.subjectAedes
dc.subjectanimal
dc.subjectdengue
dc.subjectDengue virus
dc.subjectepidemic
dc.subjectgenetics
dc.subjectinsect vector
dc.subjectisolation and purification
dc.subjectlarva
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAedes
dc.subjectAnimals
dc.subjectDengue
dc.subjectDengue Virus
dc.subjectDisease Outbreaks
dc.subjectGenotype
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectIncidence
dc.subjectInsect Vectors
dc.subjectLarva
dc.subjectSerogroup
dc.subjectSingapore
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentSAW SWEE HOCK SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
dc.description.doi10.1186/s12879-016-1606-z
dc.description.sourcetitleBMC Infectious Diseases
dc.description.volume16
dc.description.issue1
dc.description.page300
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1186_s12879-016-1606-z.pdf3.46 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons