Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4482-6
DC FieldValue
dc.titleRecruitment of racial/ethnic minority older adults through community sites for focus group discussions
dc.contributor.authorNorthridge, M.E
dc.contributor.authorShedlin, M
dc.contributor.authorSchrimshaw, E.W
dc.contributor.authorEstrada, I
dc.contributor.authorDe La Cruz, L
dc.contributor.authorPeralta, R
dc.contributor.authorBirdsall, S
dc.contributor.authorMetcalf, S.S
dc.contributor.authorChakraborty, B
dc.contributor.authorKunzel, C
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-27T10:25:07Z
dc.date.available2020-10-27T10:25:07Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationNorthridge, M.E, Shedlin, M, Schrimshaw, E.W, Estrada, I, De La Cruz, L, Peralta, R, Birdsall, S, Metcalf, S.S, Chakraborty, B, Kunzel, C (2017). Recruitment of racial/ethnic minority older adults through community sites for focus group discussions. BMC Public Health 17 (1) : 563. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4482-6
dc.identifier.issn14712458
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/181271
dc.description.abstractBackground: Despite a body of evidence on racial/ethnic minority enrollment and retention in research, literature specifically focused on recruiting racially/ethnically diverse older adults for social science studies is limited. There is a need for more rigorous research on methodological issues and the efficacy of recruitment methods. Cultural obstacles to recruitment of racial/ethnic minority older adults include language barriers, lack of cultural sensitivity of target communities on the part of researchers, and culturally inappropriate assessment tools. Methods: Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), this study critically appraised the recruitment of racial/ethnic minority older adults for focus groups. The initial approach involved using the physical and social infrastructure of the ElderSmile network, a community-based initiative to promote oral and general health and conduct health screenings in places where older adults gather, to recruit racial/ethnic minority adults for a social science component of an interdisciplinary initiative. The process involved planning a recruitment strategy, engaging the individuals involved in its implementation (opinion leaders in senior centers, program staff as implementation leaders, senior community-based colleagues as champions, and motivated center directors as change agents), executing the recruitment plan, and reflecting on the process of implementation. Results: While the recruitment phase of the study was delayed by 6 months to allow for ongoing recruitment and filling of focus group slots, the flexibility of the recruitment plan, the expertise of the research team members, the perseverance of the recruitment staff, and the cultivation of change agents ultimately resulted in meeting the study targets for enrollment in terms of both numbers of focus group discussions (n = 24) and numbers of participants (n = 194). Conclusions: This study adds to the literature in two important ways. First, we leveraged the social and physical infrastructure of an existing program to recruit participants through community sites where older adults gather. Second, we used the CFIR to guide the appraisal of the recruitment process, which underscored important considerations for both reaching and engaging this underserved population. This was especially true in terms of understanding the disparate roles of the individuals involved in implementing and facilitating the recruitment plan. © 2017 The Author(s).
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceUnpaywall 20201031
dc.subjectadult
dc.subjectAfrican American
dc.subjectaging
dc.subjectdoctor patient relation
dc.subjectethnic group
dc.subjectfemale
dc.subjecthealth equity
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectinformation processing
dc.subjectleadership
dc.subjectmajor clinical study
dc.subjectmale
dc.subjectmass screening
dc.subjectsenior center
dc.subjectsociology
dc.subjectaged
dc.subjectaging
dc.subjectfemale
dc.subjectinformation processing
dc.subjectmale
dc.subjectmedical research
dc.subjectmethodology
dc.subjectmiddle aged
dc.subjectminority group
dc.subjectpersonnel management
dc.subjectphysiology
dc.subjectprocedures
dc.subjectpsychology
dc.subjectvery elderly
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectAged, 80 and over
dc.subjectAging
dc.subjectBiomedical Research
dc.subjectEthnic Groups
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectFocus Groups
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectMinority Groups
dc.subjectPersonnel Selection
dc.subjectResearch Design
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentDUKE-NUS MEDICAL SCHOOL
dc.description.doi10.1186/s12889-017-4482-6
dc.description.sourcetitleBMC Public Health
dc.description.volume17
dc.description.issue1
dc.description.page563
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1186_s12889-017-4482-6.pdf1.11 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons