Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/425037
DC FieldValue
dc.titleDeveloping traditional Chinese medicine in the era of evidence-based medicine: Current evidences and challenges
dc.contributor.authorFung, F.Y
dc.contributor.authorLinn, Y.C
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-27T05:50:58Z
dc.date.available2020-10-27T05:50:58Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationFung, F.Y, Linn, Y.C (2015). Developing traditional Chinese medicine in the era of evidence-based medicine: Current evidences and challenges. Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2015 : 425037. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/425037
dc.identifier.issn1741427X
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/180953
dc.description.abstractEvidence-based medicine (EBM), by integrating individual clinical expertise with the best available clinical evidence from systematic research, has in recent years been established as the standard of modern medical practice for greater treatment efficacy and safety. Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM), on the other hand, evolved as a system of medical practice from ancient China more than 2000 years ago based on empirical knowledge as well as theories and concepts which are yet to be mapped by scientific equivalents. Despite the expanding TCM usage and the recognition of its therapeutic benefits worldwide, the lack of robust evidence from the EBM perspective is hindering acceptance of TCM by the Western medicine community and its integration into mainstream healthcare. For TCM to become an integral component of the healthcare system so that its benefits can be rationally harnessed in the best interests of patients, it is essential for TCM to demonstrate its efficacy and safety by high-level evidence in accordance with EBM, though much debate remains on the validity and feasibility of applying the EBM model on this traditional practice. This review aims to discuss the current status of research in TCM, explore the evidences available on its efficacy and safety, and highlight the issues and challenges faced in applying EBM to TCM. © 2015 Foon Yin Fung and Yeh Ching Linn.
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceUnpaywall 20201031
dc.subjectherbaceous agent
dc.subjectmaxingshigan yinqiaosan
dc.subjectneuroaid
dc.subjectoseltamivir
dc.subjecttianqi capsule
dc.subjectunclassified drug
dc.subjectacupuncture
dc.subjectadverse outcome
dc.subjectanalgesia
dc.subjectAsian
dc.subjectcerebrovascular accident
dc.subjectChinese medicine
dc.subjectchronic tension headache
dc.subjectclinical effectiveness
dc.subjectdrug efficacy
dc.subjectdrug granule
dc.subjectdrug safety
dc.subjectepisodic cluster headache
dc.subjectevidence based medicine
dc.subjectfollow up
dc.subjectgood clinical practice
dc.subjectherb drug interaction
dc.subjectherbal medicine
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectimpaired glucose tolerance
dc.subjectin vitro study
dc.subjectinfluenza A (H1N1)
dc.subjectirritable colon
dc.subjectlong term care
dc.subjectnonhuman
dc.subjectpain
dc.subjectpatient care
dc.subjectphysician
dc.subjectpriority journal
dc.subjectquantitative analysis
dc.subjectReview
dc.subjectshort course therapy
dc.subjectwestern medicine
dc.typeReview
dc.contributor.departmentDUKE-NUS MEDICAL SCHOOL
dc.description.doi10.1155/2015/425037
dc.description.sourcetitleEvidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
dc.description.volume2015
dc.description.page425037
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1155_2015_425037.pdf1.29 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons