Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.093773
DC FieldValue
dc.titleHearing pathways in the Yangtze finless porpoise, Neophocaena asiaeorientalis asiaeorientalis
dc.contributor.authorMooney, T.A
dc.contributor.authorLi, S
dc.contributor.authorKetten, D.R
dc.contributor.authorWang, K
dc.contributor.authorWang, D
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-26T07:14:55Z
dc.date.available2020-10-26T07:14:55Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationMooney, T.A, Li, S, Ketten, D.R, Wang, K, Wang, D (2014). Hearing pathways in the Yangtze finless porpoise, Neophocaena asiaeorientalis asiaeorientalis. Journal of Experimental Biology 217 (3) : 444-452. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.093773
dc.identifier.issn0022-0949
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/180150
dc.description.abstractHow an animal receives sound may influence its use of sound. While 'jaw hearing' is well supported for odontocetes, work examining how sound is received across the head has been limited to a few representative species. The substantial variation in jaw and head morphology among odontocetes suggests variation in sound reception. Here, we address how a divergent subspecies, the Yangtze finless porpoise (Neophocaena asiaeorientalis asiaeorientalis) hears low-, mid- and high-frequency tones, as well as broadband clicks, comparing sounds presented at different locations across the head. Hearing was measured using auditory evoked potentials (AEPs). Click and tone stimuli (8, 54 and 120 kHz) were presented at nine locations on the head and body using a suctioncup transducer. Threshold differences were compared between frequencies and locations, and referenced to the underlying anatomy using computed tomography (CT) imaging of deceased animals of the same subspecies. The best hearing locations with minimum thresholds were found adjacent to a mandibular fat pad and overlaying the auditory bulla. Mean thresholds were not substantially different at locations from the rostrum tip to the ear (11.6 dB). This contrasts with tests with bottlenose dolphins and beluga whales, in which 30-40 dB threshold differences were found across the animals' heads. Response latencies increased with decreasing response amplitudes, which suggests that latency and sensitivity are interrelated when considering sound reception across the odontocete head. The results suggest that there are differences among odontocetes in the anatomy related to receiving sound, and porpoises may have relatively less acoustic 'shadowing'. © 2014. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceUnpaywall 20201031
dc.subjectanimal
dc.subjectanimal communication
dc.subjectarticle
dc.subjectauditory brainstem response
dc.subjectevoked auditory response
dc.subjecthearing
dc.subjectinterpersonal communication
dc.subjectmarine mammal
dc.subjectnoise
dc.subjectOdontocete
dc.subjectphysiology
dc.subjectporpoise
dc.subjectSensory
dc.subjectsound
dc.subjectAuditory brainstem response
dc.subjectCommunication
dc.subjectMarine mammal
dc.subjectNoise
dc.subjectOdontocete
dc.subjectSensory
dc.subjectAnimal Communication
dc.subjectAnimals
dc.subjectEvoked Potentials, Auditory
dc.subjectHearing
dc.subjectPorpoises
dc.subjectSound
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentTROPICAL MARINE SCIENCE INSTITUTE
dc.description.doi10.1242/jeb.093773
dc.description.sourcetitleJournal of Experimental Biology
dc.description.volume217
dc.description.issue3
dc.description.page444-452
dc.published.statePublished
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1242_jeb_093773.pdf1.88 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons