Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-016-1469-6
DC FieldValue
dc.titleMembrane feeding of dengue patient's blood as a substitute for direct skin feeding in studying Aedes-dengue virus interaction
dc.contributor.authorTan, C.-H
dc.contributor.authorWong, P.-S.J
dc.contributor.authorLi, M.-Z.I
dc.contributor.authorYang, H.-T
dc.contributor.authorChong, C.-S
dc.contributor.authorLee, L.K
dc.contributor.authorYuan, S
dc.contributor.authorLeo, Y.-S
dc.contributor.authorNg, L.-C
dc.contributor.authorLye, D.C
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-26T05:10:35Z
dc.date.available2020-10-26T05:10:35Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationTan, C.-H, Wong, P.-S.J, Li, M.-Z.I, Yang, H.-T, Chong, C.-S, Lee, L.K, Yuan, S, Leo, Y.-S, Ng, L.-C, Lye, D.C (2016). Membrane feeding of dengue patient's blood as a substitute for direct skin feeding in studying Aedes-dengue virus interaction. Parasites and Vectors 9 (1) : 1469. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-016-1469-6
dc.identifier.issn17563305
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/179934
dc.description.abstractBackground: Understanding the interaction between Aedes vectors and dengue viruses (DENV) has significant implications in determining the transmission dynamics of dengue. The absence of an animal model and ethical concerns regarding direct feeding of mosquitoes on patients has resulted in most infection studies using blood meals spiked with laboratory-cultured DENV. Data obtained from such studies may not reflect the natural human-mosquito transmission scenario. This study explored the potential of using membrane feeding of dengue patient's blood as a substitute for direct skin feeding. Methods: Four to six-day old female Ae. aegypti were provided the opportunity to feed via direct exposure to a patient's forearm for 15'min or via exposure to EDTA-treated blood from the same patient through an artificial membrane for 30'min. Mosquitoes from both feeding methods were incubated inside environmental chambers. Mosquitoes were sampled at day 13 post-feeding. Midgut and salivary glands of each mosquito were dissected to determine DENV infection by RT-qPCR and viral titration, respectively. Results: Feeding rates: Direct skin feeding assay (DSFA) consistently showed higher mosquito feeding rates (93.3-100'%) when compared with the membrane feeding assay (MFA) (48-98.2'%). Midgut infection: Pair-wise comparison between methods showed no significant difference in midgut infection rates between mosquitoes exposed via each method and a strong correlation was observed in midgut infection rates for both feeding methods (r = 0.89, P < 0.0001). Overall midgut viral titers (n = 20) obtained by both methods were comparable (P ≥ 0.06). Salivary gland infection: Pair-wise comparison between both methods revealed no significant difference in salivary gland infection rate. Strong correlation in salivary gland infection was observed between DSFA and MFA (r = 0.81, P < 0.0001). In general, mosquitoes fed directly on dengue patients and those on patients' blood (n = 11) had comparable virus titer (P ≥ 0.09). Conclusion: DENV midgut and salivary gland infection rates showed good concordance between DSFA and MFA blood meal exposure methods. Freshly-obtained venous blood in EDTA from dengue patients for MFA can be used as a substitute to DSFA, especially in circumstances where bioethics approval or patient recruitment is difficult to obtain for vector competence studies. Nevertheless, mosquito numbers will need to be increased to compensate for lower feeding rate in MFA. © 2016 Tan et al.
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceUnpaywall 20201031
dc.subjectadult
dc.subjectAedes
dc.subjectanimal experiment
dc.subjectanimal tissue
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectclinical article
dc.subjectcorrelational study
dc.subjectdengue
dc.subjectdirect skin feeding assay
dc.subjectfemale
dc.subjecthost pathogen interaction
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectinfection rate
dc.subjectinvestigative procedures
dc.subjectmembrane feeding assay
dc.subjectmidgut
dc.subjectnonhuman
dc.subjectreverse transcription polymerase chain reaction
dc.subjectsalivary gland
dc.subjectserotype
dc.subjectvirus titration
dc.subjectvirus transmission
dc.subjectAedes
dc.subjectanimal
dc.subjectblood
dc.subjectdengue
dc.subjectDengue virus
dc.subjectfeeding behavior
dc.subjectgenetics
dc.subjectinsect vector
dc.subjectisolation and purification
dc.subjectmale
dc.subjectparasitology
dc.subjectphysiology
dc.subjectskin
dc.subjecttransmission
dc.subjectvirology
dc.subjectAedes
dc.subjectAnimals
dc.subjectDengue
dc.subjectDengue Virus
dc.subjectFeeding Behavior
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectInsect Vectors
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectSkin
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentMEDICINE
dc.contributor.departmentSAW SWEE HOCK SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
dc.description.doi10.1186/s13071-016-1469-6
dc.description.sourcetitleParasites and Vectors
dc.description.volume9
dc.description.issue1
dc.description.page1469
dc.published.statePublished
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1186_s13071-016-1469-6.pdf1.05 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons