Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10898-015-0270-y
DC FieldValue
dc.titleMulti objective optimization of computationally expensive multi-modal functions with RBF surrogates and multi-rule selection
dc.contributor.authorAkhtar, T
dc.contributor.authorShoemaker, C.A
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-23T08:06:05Z
dc.date.available2020-10-23T08:06:05Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationAkhtar, T, Shoemaker, C.A (2016). Multi objective optimization of computationally expensive multi-modal functions with RBF surrogates and multi-rule selection. Journal of Global Optimization 64 (1) : 17-32. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10898-015-0270-y
dc.identifier.issn0925-5001
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/179627
dc.description.abstractGOMORS is a parallel response surface-assisted evolutionary algorithm approach to multi-objective optimization that is designed to obtain good non-dominated solutions to black box problems with relatively few objective function evaluations. GOMORS uses Radial Basic Functions to iteratively compute surrogate response surfaces as an approximation of the computationally expensive objective function. A multi objective search utilizing evolution, local search, multi method search and non-dominated sorting is done on the surrogate radial basis function surface because it is inexpensive to compute. A balance between exploration, exploitation and diversification is obtained through a novel procedure that simultaneously selects evaluation points within an algorithm iteration through different metrics including Approximate Hypervolume Improvement, Maximizing minimum domain distance, Maximizing minimum objective space distance, and surrogate-assisted local search, which can be computed in parallel. The results are compared to ParEGO (a kriging surrogate method solving many weighted single objective optimizations) and the widely used NSGA-II. The results indicate that GOMORS outperforms ParEGO and NSGA-II on problems tested. For example, on a groundwater PDE problem, GOMORS outperforms ParEGO with 100, 200 and 400 evaluations for a 6 dimensional problem, a 12 dimensional problem and a 24 dimensional problem. For a fixed number of evaluations, the differences in performance between GOMORS and ParEGO become larger as the number of dimensions increase. As the number of evaluations increase, the differences between GOMORS and ParEGO become smaller. Both surrogate-based methods are much better than NSGA-II for all cases considered. © 2015, The Author(s).
dc.publisherSpringer New York LLC
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceUnpaywall 20201031
dc.subjectAlgorithms
dc.subjectElastic moduli
dc.subjectEvolutionary algorithms
dc.subjectFunction evaluation
dc.subjectFunctions
dc.subjectGlobal optimization
dc.subjectGroundwater
dc.subjectHeat conduction
dc.subjectImage segmentation
dc.subjectIterative methods
dc.subjectOptimization
dc.subjectRadial basis function networks
dc.subjectSurface properties
dc.subjectEvolutionary optimizations
dc.subjectFunction approximation
dc.subjectMeta model
dc.subjectParallel
dc.subjectRadial basis functions
dc.subjectMultiobjective optimization
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentNUS ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE
dc.description.doi10.1007/s10898-015-0270-y
dc.description.sourcetitleJournal of Global Optimization
dc.description.volume64
dc.description.issue1
dc.description.page17-32
dc.published.statePublished
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1007_s10898-015-0270-y.pdf671.23 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons