Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-016-0070-9
DC FieldValue
dc.titleThird Places for Health Promotion with Older Adults: Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to Enhance Program Implementation and Evaluation
dc.contributor.authorNorthridge, M.E
dc.contributor.authorKum, S.S
dc.contributor.authorChakraborty, B
dc.contributor.authorGreenblatt, A.P
dc.contributor.authorMarshall, S.E
dc.contributor.authorWang, H
dc.contributor.authorKunzel, C
dc.contributor.authorMetcalf, S.S
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-23T02:44:47Z
dc.date.available2020-10-23T02:44:47Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationNorthridge, M.E, Kum, S.S, Chakraborty, B, Greenblatt, A.P, Marshall, S.E, Wang, H, Kunzel, C, Metcalf, S.S (2016). Third Places for Health Promotion with Older Adults: Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to Enhance Program Implementation and Evaluation. Journal of Urban Health 93 (5) : 851-870. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-016-0070-9
dc.identifier.issn1099-3460
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/179288
dc.description.abstractThis study extends the concept of third places to include community sites where older adults gather, often for meals or companionship. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research guided program implementation and evaluation. Depending upon health promotion program needs, the physical infrastructure of a site is important, but a supportive director (champion) can often overcome identified deficits. Senior centers may be locally classified into four types based upon eligibility requirements of residents in affiliated housing and services offered. Participants who attend these centers differ in important ways across types by most sociodemographic as well as certain health and health care characteristics. © 2016, The Author(s).
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceUnpaywall 20201031
dc.subjectaged
dc.subjectcommunity care
dc.subjectfemale
dc.subjecthealth
dc.subjecthealth promotion
dc.subjecthistory
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectinterview
dc.subjectmale
dc.subjectmiddle aged
dc.subjectNew York
dc.subjectorganization and management
dc.subjectprogram evaluation
dc.subjectqualitative research
dc.subjectquestionnaire
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectAnniversaries and Special Events
dc.subjectCommunity Networks
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHealth Promotion
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectInterviews as Topic
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectNew York City
dc.subjectOral Health
dc.subjectProgram Evaluation
dc.subjectQualitative Research
dc.subjectSurveys and Questionnaires
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentDUKE-NUS MEDICAL SCHOOL
dc.description.doi10.1007/s11524-016-0070-9
dc.description.sourcetitleJournal of Urban Health
dc.description.volume93
dc.description.issue5
dc.description.page851-870
dc.published.statePublished
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1007_s11524-016-0070-9.pdf1.46 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons