Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-017-1607-3
DC FieldValue
dc.titlePhantom Study Investigating the Accuracy of Manual and Automatic Image Fusion with the GE Logiq E9: Implications for use in Percutaneous Liver Interventions
dc.contributor.authorBurgmans, M.C
dc.contributor.authorden Harder, J.M
dc.contributor.authorMeershoek, P
dc.contributor.authorvan den Berg, N.S
dc.contributor.authorChan, S.X.J.M
dc.contributor.authorvan Leeuwen, F.W.B
dc.contributor.authorvan Erkel, A.R
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-23T02:28:55Z
dc.date.available2020-10-23T02:28:55Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationBurgmans, M.C, den Harder, J.M, Meershoek, P, van den Berg, N.S, Chan, S.X.J.M, van Leeuwen, F.W.B, van Erkel, A.R (2017). Phantom Study Investigating the Accuracy of Manual and Automatic Image Fusion with the GE Logiq E9: Implications for use in Percutaneous Liver Interventions. CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 40 (6) : 914-923. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-017-1607-3
dc.identifier.issn01741551
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/179202
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To determine the accuracy of automatic and manual co-registration methods for image fusion of three-dimensional computed tomography (CT) with real-time ultrasonography (US) for image-guided liver interventions. Materials and Methods: CT images of a skills phantom with liver lesions were acquired and co-registered to US using GE Logiq E9 navigation software. Manual co-registration was compared to automatic and semiautomatic co-registration using an active tracker. Also, manual point registration was compared to plane registration with and without an additional translation point. Finally, comparison was made between manual and automatic selection of reference points. In each experiment, accuracy of the co-registration method was determined by measurement of the residual displacement in phantom lesions by two independent observers. Results: Mean displacements for a superficial and deep liver lesion were comparable after manual and semiautomatic co-registration: 2.4 and 2.0 mm versus 2.0 and 2.5 mm, respectively. Both methods were significantly better than automatic co-registration: 5.9 and 5.2 mm residual displacement (p < 0.001; p < 0.01). The accuracy of manual point registration was higher than that of plane registration, the latter being heavily dependent on accurate matching of axial CT and US images by the operator. Automatic reference point selection resulted in significantly lower registration accuracy compared to manual point selection despite lower root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) values. Conclusion: The accuracy of manual and semiautomatic co-registration is better than that of automatic co-registration. For manual co-registration using a plane, choosing the correct plane orientation is an essential first step in the registration process. Automatic reference point selection based on RMSD values is error-prone. © 2017, The Author(s).
dc.publisherSpringer New York LLC
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceUnpaywall 20201031
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectcomputed tomography scanner
dc.subjectcomputer assisted tomography
dc.subjectcontrolled study
dc.subjectechography
dc.subjectimaging phantom
dc.subjectliver injury
dc.subjectliver metastasis
dc.subjectmeasurement accuracy
dc.subjectpriority journal
dc.subjectultrasound transducer
dc.subjectechography
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectimage processing
dc.subjectliver
dc.subjectmultimodal imaging
dc.subjectprocedures
dc.subjectreproducibility
dc.subjectthree dimensional imaging
dc.subjectx-ray computed tomography
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectImage Processing, Computer-Assisted
dc.subjectImaging, Three-Dimensional
dc.subjectLiver
dc.subjectMultimodal Imaging
dc.subjectPhantoms, Imaging
dc.subjectReproducibility of Results
dc.subjectTomography, X-Ray Computed
dc.subjectUltrasonography
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentDUKE-NUS MEDICAL SCHOOL
dc.description.doi10.1007/s00270-017-1607-3
dc.description.sourcetitleCardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
dc.description.volume40
dc.description.issue6
dc.description.page914-923
dc.published.statePublished
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1007_s00270-017-1607-3.pdf1.11 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons