Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep26080
DC FieldValue
dc.titleRandomized Clinical Trial for Early Postoperative Complications of Ex-PRESS Implantation versus Trabeculectomy: Complications Postoperatively of Ex-PRESS versus Trabeculectomy Study (CPETS)
dc.contributor.authorArimura, S
dc.contributor.authorTakihara, Y
dc.contributor.authorMiyake, S
dc.contributor.authorIwasaki, K
dc.contributor.authorGozawa, M
dc.contributor.authorMatsumura, T
dc.contributor.authorTomomatsu, T
dc.contributor.authorTakamura, Y
dc.contributor.authorInatani, M
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-22T02:58:17Z
dc.date.available2020-10-22T02:58:17Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationArimura, S, Takihara, Y, Miyake, S, Iwasaki, K, Gozawa, M, Matsumura, T, Tomomatsu, T, Takamura, Y, Inatani, M (2016). Randomized Clinical Trial for Early Postoperative Complications of Ex-PRESS Implantation versus Trabeculectomy: Complications Postoperatively of Ex-PRESS versus Trabeculectomy Study (CPETS). Scientific Reports 6 : 26080. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep26080
dc.identifier.issn20452322
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/178908
dc.description.abstractWe compared early postoperative complications between trabeculectomy and Ex-PRESS implantation. Enrolled patients with 39 primary open-angle or 25 exfoliative glaucoma were randomly assigned to receive trabeculectomy (trabeculectomy group) or Ex-PRESS implantation (Ex-PRESS group). Primary outcomes were early postoperative complications, including postoperative anterior chamber inflammation, frequencies of hyphema, flat anterior chamber, choroidal detachment, hypotonic maculopathy, and the change of visual acuity. The postoperative flare values in trabeculectomy group were higher than those in the Ex-PRESS group (overall, P = 0.004; and 10 days, P = 0.02). Hyphema occurred significantly more frequently in the trabeculectomy group (P = 0.0025). There were no significant differences of the other primary outcomes between the two groups. Additionally, duration of anterior chamber opening was significantly shorter in the Ex-PRESS group (P = 0.0002) and the eyes that had iris contact with Ex-PRESS tube had significantly shallower anterior chambers than did the eyes without the iris contact (P = 0.013). The Ex-PRESS implantation prevented early postoperative inflammation and hyphema in the anterior chamber and shortened the duration of anterior chamber opening. Iris contact with the Ex-PRESS tube occurred more frequently in eyes with open-angle glaucoma and shallow anterior chambers.
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceUnpaywall 20201031
dc.subjectcomparative study
dc.subjectcontrolled study
dc.subjectglaucoma
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectJapan
dc.subjectpostoperative complication
dc.subjectprocedures
dc.subjectprosthesis implantation
dc.subjectrandomized controlled trial
dc.subjecttrabeculectomy
dc.subjectGlaucoma
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectJapan
dc.subjectPostoperative Complications
dc.subjectProsthesis Implantation
dc.subjectTrabeculectomy
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentCANCER SCIENCE INSTITUTE OF SINGAPORE
dc.description.doi10.1038/srep26080
dc.description.sourcetitleScientific Reports
dc.description.volume6
dc.description.page26080
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1038_srep26080.pdf439.19 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons