Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep39140
DC FieldValue
dc.titleHybrid microscaffold-based 3D bioprinting of multi-cellular constructs with high compressive strength: A new biofabrication strategy
dc.contributor.authorTan, Y.J
dc.contributor.authorTan, X
dc.contributor.authorYeong, W.Y
dc.contributor.authorTor, S.B
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-21T08:13:54Z
dc.date.available2020-10-21T08:13:54Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationTan, Y.J, Tan, X, Yeong, W.Y, Tor, S.B (2016). Hybrid microscaffold-based 3D bioprinting of multi-cellular constructs with high compressive strength: A new biofabrication strategy. Scientific Reports 6 : 39140. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep39140
dc.identifier.issn20452322
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/178746
dc.description.abstractA hybrid 3D bioprinting approach using porous microscaffolds and extrusion-based printing method is presented. Bioink constitutes of cell-laden poly(D,L-lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) porous microspheres with thin encapsulation of agarose-collagen composite hydrogel (AC hydrogel). Highly porous microspheres enable cells to adhere and proliferate before printing. Meanwhile, AC hydrogel allows a smooth delivery of cell-laden microspheres (CLMs), with immediate gelation of construct upon printing on cold build platform. Collagen fibrils were formed in the AC hydrogel during culture at body temperature, improving the cell affinity and spreading compared to pure agarose hydrogel. Cells were proven to proliferate in the bioink and the bioprinted construct. High cell viability up to 14 days was observed. The compressive strength of the bioink is more than 100 times superior to those of pure AC hydrogel. A potential alternative in tissue engineering of tissue replacements and biological models is made possible by combining the advantages of the conventional solid scaffolds with the new 3D bioprinting technology. © The Author(s) 2016.
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceUnpaywall 20201031
dc.subjectpolyethylene glycol dimethacrylate hydrogel
dc.subjectanimal
dc.subjectbioprinting
dc.subjectbody temperature
dc.subjectcell line
dc.subjectcell proliferation
dc.subjectcell survival
dc.subjectchemistry
dc.subjectcompressive strength
dc.subjectdevices
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectprocedures
dc.subjectthree dimensional printing
dc.subjecttissue scaffold
dc.subjectAnimals
dc.subjectBioprinting
dc.subjectBody Temperature
dc.subjectCell Line
dc.subjectCell Proliferation
dc.subjectCell Survival
dc.subjectCompressive Strength
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectHydrogel, Polyethylene Glycol Dimethacrylate
dc.subjectPrinting, Three-Dimensional
dc.subjectTissue Scaffolds
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentBIOMED INST FOR GLOBAL HEALTH RES & TECH
dc.description.doi10.1038/srep39140
dc.description.sourcetitleScientific Reports
dc.description.volume6
dc.description.page39140
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1038_srep39140.pdf6.83 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons