Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-30004-9
DC FieldValue
dc.titleTrends of Visual Impairment and Blindness in the Singapore Chinese Population over a Decade
dc.contributor.authorTham, Y.-C
dc.contributor.authorLim, S.-H
dc.contributor.authorShi, Y
dc.contributor.authorChee, M.-L
dc.contributor.authorZheng, Y.F
dc.contributor.authorChua, J
dc.contributor.authorSaw, S.-M
dc.contributor.authorFoster, P
dc.contributor.authorAung, T
dc.contributor.authorWong, T.Y
dc.contributor.authorCheng, C.-Y
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-20T09:43:12Z
dc.date.available2020-10-20T09:43:12Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationTham, Y.-C, Lim, S.-H, Shi, Y, Chee, M.-L, Zheng, Y.F, Chua, J, Saw, S.-M, Foster, P, Aung, T, Wong, T.Y, Cheng, C.-Y (2018). Trends of Visual Impairment and Blindness in the Singapore Chinese Population over a Decade. Scientific Reports 8 (1) : 12224. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-30004-9
dc.identifier.issn2045-2322
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/178395
dc.description.abstractWe evaluated the prevalence of visual impairment (VI) and blindness among Chinese adults in the Singapore Chinese Eye Study (SCES, 2009–2011), and compared the trends with the Tanjong Pagar Survey, Singapore (TPS), conducted a decade earlier. The SCES comprised of 3,353 Chinese adults aged ?40 years (response rate, 72.8%). Participants underwent standardized examinations, including measurements of presenting, and best-corrected visual acuity (VA). Bilateral VI (VA < 20/40 to ?20/200) and blindness (VA < 20/200) were defined based on the United States definition (better-seeing eye). Age-standardized prevalence was calculated using the 2010 Singapore Chinese Population Census. Primary causes and factors associated with VI and blindness were evaluated. In SCES, the age-standardized prevalence of presenting bilateral VI and blindness were 17.7% and 0.6%, respectively; the age-standardised prevalence of best-corrected bilateral VI and blindness were 3.4% and 0.2%, respectively. The previous TPS reported similar rates of best-corrected bilateral VI (3.8%) and blindness (0.3%). In SCES, cataract remains the main cause for both best-corrected bilateral VI (76.0%) and blindness (50.0%). Older age, female, lower income, lower educational level, and smaller housing type were associated with presenting bilateral VI or blindness (all P ? 0.025). These findings will be useful for the planning of eye care services and resource allocation. © 2018, The Author(s).
dc.publisherNature Publishing Group
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceUnpaywall 20201031
dc.subjectadult
dc.subjectaged
dc.subjectAsian continental ancestry group
dc.subjectblindness
dc.subjectChina
dc.subjectcross-sectional study
dc.subjectfemale
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectlongitudinal study
dc.subjectmale
dc.subjectmiddle aged
dc.subjectprevalence
dc.subjectSingapore
dc.subjectvisual acuity
dc.subjectvisual disorder
dc.subjectvisually impaired person
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectAsian Continental Ancestry Group
dc.subjectBlindness
dc.subjectChina
dc.subjectCross-Sectional Studies
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectLongitudinal Studies
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectPrevalence
dc.subjectSingapore
dc.subjectVision Disorders
dc.subjectVisual Acuity
dc.subjectVisually Impaired Persons
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentDUKE-NUS MEDICAL SCHOOL
dc.contributor.departmentSAW SWEE HOCK SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
dc.contributor.departmentOPHTHALMOLOGY
dc.description.doi10.1038/s41598-018-30004-9
dc.description.sourcetitleScientific Reports
dc.description.volume8
dc.description.issue1
dc.description.page12224
dc.published.statepublished
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1038_s41598-018-30004-9.pdf1.18 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons