Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.23827
DC FieldValue
dc.titleDeterminants of variability of five programmed death ligand-1 immunohistochemistry assays in non-small cell lung cancer samples
dc.contributor.authorSoo, R.A
dc.contributor.authorLim, J.S.Y
dc.contributor.authorAsuncion, B.R
dc.contributor.authorFazreen, Z
dc.contributor.authorHerrera, M.C
dc.contributor.authorOmar, M.F.M
dc.contributor.authorPhuong, N.H.D
dc.contributor.authorSeet, J.E
dc.contributor.authorAmanuel, B
dc.contributor.authorIacopetta, B
dc.contributor.authorByrne, D
dc.contributor.authorHendry, S
dc.contributor.authorFox, S
dc.contributor.authorSoong, R
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-20T05:11:01Z
dc.date.available2020-10-20T05:11:01Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationSoo, R.A, Lim, J.S.Y, Asuncion, B.R, Fazreen, Z, Herrera, M.C, Omar, M.F.M, Phuong, N.H.D, Seet, J.E, Amanuel, B, Iacopetta, B, Byrne, D, Hendry, S, Fox, S, Soong, R (2018). Determinants of variability of five programmed death ligand-1 immunohistochemistry assays in non-small cell lung cancer samples. Oncotarget 9 (6) : 6841-6851. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.23827
dc.identifier.issn19492553
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/178122
dc.description.abstractProgrammed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression as determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) is potentially predictive of clinical outcome. The aim of this study was to assess the concordance of reported PD-L1 IHC assays and investigate factors influencing variability. Consecutive sections from 20 non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) comprising resection, core biopsy, cytology and pleural fluid samples underwent IHC with 5 different antibody/autostainer combinations: 22C3/Link48, 28-8/BOND-MAX, E1L3N/BOND-MAX, SP142/BenchMark and SP263/BenchMark. PDL1 RNA levels were assessed using RNAscope. The frequency of positive cases using scoring thresholds from clinical trials was 72%, 33%, 61%, 56%, and 33% for the 5 IHC protocols respectively, and 33% for RNAscope. Pairwise agreement on the classification of cases as positive or negative for PD-L1 expression ranged from 61%- 94%. On a continuous scale, the lowest correlation was between 28-8/BOND-MAX and SP142/BenchMark (R2=0.25) and highest was between 22C3/Link48 and E1L3N/ BOND-MAX (R2=0.71). When cases were ordered according to tumor cell (TC)%, a similar ranking of cases across IHC protocols could be observed, albeit with different quanta and limits of detection. Single-slide OPAL 7-color fluorescence IHC analysis revealed a high degree of co-localization of staining from the 5 PD-L1 antibodies. Using SP142 antibody in a BOND-MAX protocol led to increased TC% quanta, while retaining a similar ranking of samples according to TC%. The results of this study highlight tumor PD-L1 status can vary significantly according to IHC protocol. Protocoldependent staining intensities and nominated thresholds for positivity contribute to this variability, while the antibody used appears to be less of a factor. © Soo et al.
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceUnpaywall 20201031
dc.subjectprogrammed death 1 ligand 1
dc.subjectRNA
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectclinical article
dc.subjectcontrolled study
dc.subjectcytodiagnosis
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjecthuman tissue
dc.subjectimmunohistochemistry
dc.subjectin situ hybridization
dc.subjectlung biopsy
dc.subjectlung resection
dc.subjectnon small cell lung cancer
dc.subjectpleura fluid
dc.subjectprotein expression
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentCANCER SCIENCE INSTITUTE OF SINGAPORE
dc.contributor.departmentPATHOLOGY
dc.description.doi10.18632/oncotarget.23827
dc.description.sourcetitleOncotarget
dc.description.volume9
dc.description.issue6
dc.description.page6841-6851
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_18632_oncotarget_23827.pdf6.34 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons