Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2415-6-17
DC FieldValue
dc.titleComparison of age-specific cataract prevalence in two population-based surveys 6 years apart
dc.contributor.authorTan, A.G
dc.contributor.authorJie, J.W
dc.contributor.authorRochtchina, E
dc.contributor.authorMitchell, P
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-20T04:51:10Z
dc.date.available2020-10-20T04:51:10Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.identifier.citationTan, A.G, Jie, J.W, Rochtchina, E, Mitchell, P (2006). Comparison of age-specific cataract prevalence in two population-based surveys 6 years apart. BMC Ophthalmology 6 : 17. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2415-6-17
dc.identifier.issn14712415
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/178020
dc.description.abstractBackground: In this study, we aimed to compare age-specific cortical, nuclear and posterior subcapsular (PSC) cataract prevalence in two surveys 6 years apart. Methods: The Blue Mountains Eye Study examined 3654 participants (82.4% of those eligible) in cross-section I (1992-4) and 3509 participants (75.1% of survivors and 85.2% of newly eligible) in cross-section II (1997-2000, 66.5% overlap with cross-section I). Cataract was assessed from lens photographs following the Wisconsin Cataract Grading System. Cortical cataract was defined if cortical opacity comprised ? 5% of lens area. Nuclear cataract was defined if nuclear opacity ? Wisconsin standard 4. PSC was defined if any present. Any cataract was defined to include persons who had previous cataract surgery. Weighted kappa for inter-grader reliability was 0.82, 0.55 and 0.82 for cortical, nuclear and PSC cataract, respectively. We assessed age-specific prevalence using an interval of 5 years, so that participants within each age group were independent between the two surveys. Results: Age and gender distributions were similar between the two populations. The age-specific prevalence of cortical (23.8% in 1st, 23.7% in 2nd) and PSC cataract (6.3%, 6.0%) was similar. The prevalence of nuclear cataract increased slightly from 18.7% to 23.9%. After age standardization, the similar prevalence of cortical (23.8%, 23.5%) and PSC cataract (6.3%, 5.9%), and the increased prevalence of nuclear cataract (18.7%, 24.2%) remained. Conclusion: In two surveys of two population-based samples with similar age and gender distributions, we found a relatively stable cortical and PSC cataract prevalence over a 6-year period. The increased prevalence of nuclear cataract deserves further study. © 2006 Tan et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceUnpaywall 20201031
dc.subjectadult
dc.subjectaged
dc.subjectarticle
dc.subjectbrain cortex
dc.subjectcataract
dc.subjectcortical cataract
dc.subjectdisease classification
dc.subjectfemale
dc.subjectgroups by age
dc.subjecthealth survey
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectlens
dc.subjectmajor clinical study
dc.subjectmale
dc.subjectnuclear cataract
dc.subjectpopulation research
dc.subjectprevalence
dc.subjectsubcapsular cataract
dc.subjectsystematic review
dc.subjectage distribution
dc.subjectAustralia
dc.subjectcataract
dc.subjectcomparative study
dc.subjectcross-sectional study
dc.subjectmiddle aged
dc.subjectsex ratio
dc.subjectvery elderly
dc.subjectAge Distribution
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectAged, 80 and over
dc.subjectAustralia
dc.subjectCataract
dc.subjectCross-Sectional Studies
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHealth Surveys
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectPrevalence
dc.subjectSex Distribution
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentDUKE-NUS MEDICAL SCHOOL
dc.description.doi10.1186/1471-2415-6-17
dc.description.sourcetitleBMC Ophthalmology
dc.description.volume6
dc.description.page17
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1186_1471-2415-6-17.pdf203.57 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons