Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-018-0496-1
DC FieldValue
dc.titleValidation of a rapid semi-automated method to assess left atrial longitudinal phasic strains on cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging
dc.contributor.authorLeng, S
dc.contributor.authorTan, R.-S
dc.contributor.authorZhao, X
dc.contributor.authorAllen, J.C
dc.contributor.authorKoh, A.S
dc.contributor.authorZhong, L
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-14T08:27:04Z
dc.date.available2020-09-14T08:27:04Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationLeng, S, Tan, R.-S, Zhao, X, Allen, J.C, Koh, A.S, Zhong, L (2018). Validation of a rapid semi-automated method to assess left atrial longitudinal phasic strains on cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 20 (1) : 71. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-018-0496-1
dc.identifier.issn1097-6647
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/176195
dc.description.abstractBackground: Abnormal left atrial (LA) function is a marker of cardiac dysfunction and adverse cardiovascular outcome, but is difficult to assess, and hence not, routinely quantified. We aimed to determine the feasibility and effectiveness of a fast method to measure long-axis LA strain and strain rate (SR) with standard cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) compared to conventional feature tracking (FT) derived longitudinal strain. Methods: We studied 50 normal controls, 30 patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and 100 heart failure (HF) patients, including 40 with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), 30 mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF) and 30 preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). LA longitudinal strain and SR parameters were derived by tracking the distance between the left atrioventricular junction and a user-defined point at the mid posterior LA wall on standard cine CMR two- and four-chamber views. LA performance was analyzed at three distinct cardiac phases: reservoir function (reservoir strain ϵ s and strain rate SR s ), conduit function (conduit strain ϵ e and strain rate SR e ) and booster pump function (booster strain ϵ a and strain rate SR a ). Results: There was good agreement between LA longitudinal strain and SR assessed using the fast and conventional FT-CMR approaches (r = 0.89 to 0.99, p < 0.001). The fast strain and SRs showed a better intra- and inter-observer reproducibility and a 55% reduction in evaluation time (85 ± 10 vs. 190 ± 12 s, p < 0.001) compared to FT-CMR. Fast LA measurements in normal controls were 35.3 ± 5.2% for ϵ s , 18.1 ± 4.3% for ϵ e , 17.2 ± 3.5% for ϵ a , and 1.8 ± 0.4, - 2.0 ± 0.5, - 2.3 ± 0.6 s - 1 for the respective phasic SRs. Significantly reduced LA strains and SRs were observed in all patient groups compared to normal controls. Patients with HFpEF and HFmrEF had significantly smaller ϵ s , SR s , ϵ e and SR e than hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and HFmrEF had significantly impaired LA reservoir and booster function compared to HFpEF. The fast LA strains and SRs were similar to FT-CMR for discriminating patients from controls (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.79 to 0.96 vs. 0.76 to 0.93, p = NS). Conclusions: Novel quantitative LA strain and SR derived from conventional cine CMR images are fast assessable parameters for LA phasic function analysis. © 2018 The Author(s).
dc.sourceUnpaywall 20200831
dc.subjectadult
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectcardiovascular magnetic resonance
dc.subjectcardiovascular parameters
dc.subjectcine magnetic resonance imaging
dc.subjectclinical effectiveness
dc.subjectclinical feature
dc.subjectcontrolled study
dc.subjectfeasibility study
dc.subjectfemale
dc.subjectheart failure
dc.subjectheart failure mid range ejection fraction
dc.subjectheart failure with preserved ejection fraction
dc.subjectheart failure with reduced ejection fraction
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjecthypertrophic cardiomyopathy
dc.subjectleft atrial longitudinal phasic strain
dc.subjectmajor clinical study
dc.subjectmale
dc.subjectmiddle aged
dc.subjectpriority journal
dc.subjectreproducibility
dc.subjectvalidation study
dc.subjectaged
dc.subjectautomation
dc.subjectcase control study
dc.subjectcine magnetic resonance imaging
dc.subjectcomparative study
dc.subjectcomputer assisted diagnosis
dc.subjectdiagnostic imaging
dc.subjectheart atrium function
dc.subjectheart contraction
dc.subjectheart left ventricle function
dc.subjectpathophysiology
dc.subjectpredictive value
dc.subjectprocedures
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectAtrial Function, Left
dc.subjectAutomation
dc.subjectCardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic
dc.subjectCase-Control Studies
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHeart Failure
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectImage Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
dc.subjectMagnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectMyocardial Contraction
dc.subjectPredictive Value of Tests
dc.subjectReproducibility of Results
dc.subjectVentricular Function, Left
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentDUKE-NUS MEDICAL SCHOOL
dc.description.doi10.1186/s12968-018-0496-1
dc.description.sourcetitleJournal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
dc.description.volume20
dc.description.issue1
dc.description.page71
dc.published.statePublished
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1186_s12968-018-0496-1.pdf3.09 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.