Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4948434
DC FieldValue
dc.titleUnderstanding the difference in cohesive energies between alpha and beta tin in DFT calculations
dc.contributor.authorLegrain, F
dc.contributor.authorManzhos, S
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-14T08:14:17Z
dc.date.available2020-09-14T08:14:17Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationLegrain, F, Manzhos, S (2016). Understanding the difference in cohesive energies between alpha and beta tin in DFT calculations. AIP Advances 6 (4) : 45116. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4948434
dc.identifier.issn2158-3226
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/176132
dc.description.abstractThe transition temperature between the low-temperature alpha phase of tin to beta tin is close to the room temperature (Tαβ = 130C), and the difference in cohesive energy of the two phases at 0 K of about ΔEcoh =0.02 eV/atom is at the limit of the accuracy of DFT (density functional theory) with available exchange-correlation functionals. It is however critically important to model the relative phase energies correctly for any reasonable description of phenomena and technologies involving these phases, for example, the performance of tin electrodes in electrochemical batteries. Here, we show that several commonly used and converged DFT setups using the most practical and widely used PBE functional result in ΔEcoh 0.04 eV/atom, with different types of basis sets and with different models of core electrons (all-electron or pseudopotentials of different types), which leads to a significant overestimation of Tαβ. We show that this is due to the errors in relative positions of s and p -like bands, which, combined with different populations of these bands in α and β Sn, leads to overstabilization of alpha tin. We show that this error can be effectively corrected by applying a Hubbard +U correction to s -like states, whereby correct cohesive energies of both α and β Sn can be obtained with the same computational scheme. We quantify for the first time the effects of anharmonicity on ΔEcoh and find that it is negligible. © 2016 Author(s).
dc.sourceUnpaywall 20200831
dc.subjectComputation theory
dc.subjectTemperature
dc.subjectTime varying systems
dc.subjectTin
dc.subjectAnharmonicities
dc.subjectCohesive energies
dc.subjectComputational schemes
dc.subjectElectrochemical batteries
dc.subjectExchange-correlation functionals
dc.subjectLow temperatures
dc.subjectPseudopotentials
dc.subjectRelative positions
dc.subjectDensity functional theory
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentMECHANICAL ENGINEERING
dc.description.doi10.1063/1.4948434
dc.description.sourcetitleAIP Advances
dc.description.volume6
dc.description.issue4
dc.description.page45116
dc.published.statePublished
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1063_1_4948434.pdf3.57 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.