Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.115.002956
DC FieldValue
dc.titleRacial differences in electrocardiographic characteristics and prognostic significance in Whites versus Asians
dc.contributor.authorSanthanakrishnan, R
dc.contributor.authorWang, N
dc.contributor.authorLarson, M.G
dc.contributor.authorMagnani, J.M
dc.contributor.authorVasan, R.S
dc.contributor.authorWang, T.J
dc.contributor.authorYap, J
dc.contributor.authorFeng, L
dc.contributor.authorYap, K.B
dc.contributor.authorOng, H.Y
dc.contributor.authorNg, T.P
dc.contributor.authorRichards, A.M
dc.contributor.authorLam, C.S.P
dc.contributor.authorHo, J.E
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-14T07:41:38Z
dc.date.available2020-09-14T07:41:38Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationSanthanakrishnan, R, Wang, N, Larson, M.G, Magnani, J.M, Vasan, R.S, Wang, T.J, Yap, J, Feng, L, Yap, K.B, Ong, H.Y, Ng, T.P, Richards, A.M, Lam, C.S.P, Ho, J.E (2015). Racial differences in electrocardiographic characteristics and prognostic significance in Whites versus Asians. Journal of the American Heart Association 5 (3) : e002956. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.115.002956
dc.identifier.issn2047-9980
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/176003
dc.description.abstractBackground: Racial differences in electrocardiographic (ECG) characteristics and prognostic significance among Whites and Asians are not well described. Methods and Results: We studied 2677 White Framingham Heart Study participants (57% women) and 2972 Asian (64% women) Singapore Longitudinal Aging Study participants (mean age 66 years in both) free of myocardial infarction or heart failure. Racial differences in ECG characteristics and effect on mortality were assessed. In linear regression models, PR interval was longer in Asians compared with Whites (multivariable-adjusted β±SE 5.0±1.4 ms in men and 6.6±0.9 ms in women, both P<0.0006). QT interval was shorter in Asian men (β±SE -6.2±1.2 ms, P<0.0001) and longer in Asian women (β±SE 3.6±0.9 ms, P=0.02) compared to White men and women, respectively. Asians had greater odds of having ECG left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) compared with Whites (odds ratio [OR] 3.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.36-9.35 for men, OR 1.93, 95% CI 1.35-2.76 for women, both P<0.02). Over a mean follow-up of 11±3 years in Framingham and 8±3 years in Singapore, mortality rates were 24.5 and 13.4 per 1000 person-years among Whites and Asians, respectively. In Cox models, the presence of LVH had a greater effect on all-cause mortality in Asians compared with Whites (hazard ratio [HR] 2.66, 95% CI 1.83-3.88 vs HR 1.30, 95% CI 0.90-1.89, P for interaction=0.02). Conclusion: Our findings from two large community-based cohorts show prominent race differences in ECG characteristics between Whites and Asians, and also suggest a differential association with mortality. These differences may carry implications for race-specific ECG reference ranges and cardiovascular risk. © 2016 The Authors.
dc.sourceUnpaywall 20200831
dc.subjectaged
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectAsian
dc.subjectcardiovascular risk
dc.subjectCaucasian
dc.subjectcontrolled study
dc.subjectelectrocardiography
dc.subjectfemale
dc.subjectfollow up
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectmale
dc.subjectmortality rate
dc.subjectPR interval
dc.subjectpriority journal
dc.subjectprognosis
dc.subjectQT interval
dc.subjectrace difference
dc.subjectaction potential
dc.subjectAsian continental ancestry group
dc.subjectCardiovascular Diseases
dc.subjectCaucasian
dc.subjectclinical trial
dc.subjectcomparative study
dc.subjectepidemiology
dc.subjectethnology
dc.subjecthealth disparity
dc.subjectheart muscle conduction system
dc.subjectheart rate
dc.subjectHypertrophy, Left Ventricular
dc.subjectKaplan Meier method
dc.subjectlongitudinal study
dc.subjectMassachusetts
dc.subjectmiddle aged
dc.subjectmortality
dc.subjectmulticenter study
dc.subjectmultivariate analysis
dc.subjectpathophysiology
dc.subjectpredictive value
dc.subjectprognosis
dc.subjectproportional hazards model
dc.subjectprospective study
dc.subjectrisk assessment
dc.subjectrisk factor
dc.subjectsex difference
dc.subjectSingapore
dc.subjectstatistical model
dc.subjecttime factor
dc.subjectvery elderly
dc.subjectAction Potentials
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectAged, 80 and over
dc.subjectAsian Continental Ancestry Group
dc.subjectCardiovascular Diseases
dc.subjectElectrocardiography
dc.subjectEuropean Continental Ancestry Group
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHealth Status Disparities
dc.subjectHeart Conduction System
dc.subjectHeart Rate
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectHypertrophy, Left Ventricular
dc.subjectKaplan-Meier Estimate
dc.subjectLinear Models
dc.subjectLongitudinal Studies
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMassachusetts
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectMultivariate Analysis
dc.subjectPredictive Value of Tests
dc.subjectPrognosis
dc.subjectProportional Hazards Models
dc.subjectProspective Studies
dc.subjectRisk Assessment
dc.subjectRisk Factors
dc.subjectSex Factors
dc.subjectSingapore
dc.subjectTime Factors
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentMEDICINE
dc.contributor.departmentPSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE
dc.contributor.departmentDUKE-NUS MEDICAL SCHOOL
dc.description.doi10.1161/JAHA.115.002956
dc.description.sourcetitleJournal of the American Heart Association
dc.description.volume5
dc.description.issue3
dc.description.pagee002956
dc.published.statePublished
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1161_JAHA_115_002956.pdf324.17 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.