Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1122-5
DC FieldValue
dc.titleThe predominant learning approaches of medical students
dc.contributor.authorChonkar, S.P
dc.contributor.authorHa, T.C
dc.contributor.authorChu, S.S.H
dc.contributor.authorNg, A.X
dc.contributor.authorLim, M.L.S
dc.contributor.authorEe, T.X
dc.contributor.authorNg, M.J
dc.contributor.authorTan, K.H
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-09T10:31:46Z
dc.date.available2020-09-09T10:31:46Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationChonkar, S.P, Ha, T.C, Chu, S.S.H, Ng, A.X, Lim, M.L.S, Ee, T.X, Ng, M.J, Tan, K.H (2018). The predominant learning approaches of medical students. BMC Medical Education 18 (1) : 17. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1122-5
dc.identifier.issn1472-6920
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/175406
dc.description.abstractBackground: By identifying medical students' learning approaches and the factors that influence students' learning approaches, medical schools and health care institutions are better equipped to intervene and optimize their learning experience. The aims of our study is to determine the predominant learning approach amongst medical students on a clinical posting in a hospital in Singapore and to examine the demographic factors that affect their learning approach. Methods: The Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students (ASSIST) questionnaire was administered to 250 medical students from various medical schools on clinical attachment to the Obstetrics and Gynaecology (O&G) department of KK Women's and Children's Hospital (KKH) Singapore between March 2013 and May 2015 to determine students' predominant learning approaches. Multinomial logistic regression was used to examine the association between demographic factors (age, gender and highest education qualification) and predominant learning approach. A cut-off of p < 0.05 was used for statistical significance. Results: Amongst 238 students with one predominant learning approach, 96 (40.3%) and 121 students (50.8%) adopted the deep and strategic approach respectively, whilst only 21 (8.8%) adopted the surface approach. Male students appeared less likely to adopt the strategic learning approach than female students (p value = 0.06). Predominant learning approaches were not influenced by demographic characteristics such as age, gender and highest educational qualifications. Conclusions: This study provided insight into the learning approaches of a heterogeneous group of medical students in Singapore. While it is encouraging that the majority of students predominantly utilised the deep and strategic learning approach, there was a significant proportion of students who utilised the surface approach. Interventions can be explored to promote deeper learning amongst these students. © The Author(s). 2018.
dc.sourceUnpaywall 20200831
dc.subjectage
dc.subjectarticle
dc.subjectchild
dc.subjectfemale
dc.subjectgender
dc.subjectgynecology
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjecthuman experiment
dc.subjectlearning style
dc.subjectmajor clinical study
dc.subjectmale
dc.subjectmedical school
dc.subjectmedical student
dc.subjectobstetrics
dc.subjectquestionnaire
dc.subjectSingapore
dc.subjectstatistical significance
dc.subjectstudy skills
dc.subjectadult
dc.subjecteducation
dc.subjectlearning
dc.subjectmedical education
dc.subjectmedical student
dc.subjectpsychology
dc.subjectyoung adult
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectEducation, Medical, Undergraduate
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectGynecology
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectLearning
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectObstetrics
dc.subjectStudents, Medical
dc.subjectYoung Adult
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentDUKE-NUS MEDICAL SCHOOL
dc.contributor.departmentDEAN'S OFFICE (DUKE-NUS MEDICAL SCHOOL)
dc.description.doi10.1186/s12909-018-1122-5
dc.description.sourcetitleBMC Medical Education
dc.description.volume18
dc.description.issue1
dc.description.page17
dc.published.statePublished
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1186_s12909-018-1122-5.pdf377.31 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.