Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.3390/s151024977
DC FieldValue
dc.titlePerformance evaluation of wearable sensor systems: A case study in moderate-scale deployment in hospital environment
dc.contributor.authorSun, W
dc.contributor.authorGe, Y
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Z
dc.contributor.authorWong, W.-C
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-09T06:45:20Z
dc.date.available2020-09-09T06:45:20Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationSun, W, Ge, Y, Zhang, Z, Wong, W.-C (2015). Performance evaluation of wearable sensor systems: A case study in moderate-scale deployment in hospital environment. Sensors (Switzerland) 15 (10) : 24977-24995. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.3390/s151024977
dc.identifier.issn1424-8220
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/175280
dc.description.abstractA wearable sensor system enables continuous and remote health monitoring and is widely considered as the next generation of healthcare technology. The performance, the packet error rate (PER) in particular, of a wearable sensor system may deteriorate due to a number of factors, particularly the interference from the other wearable sensor systems in the vicinity. We systematically evaluate the performance of the wearable sensor system in terms of PER in the presence of such interference in this paper. The factors that affect the performance of the wearable sensor system, such as density, traffic load, and transmission power in a realistic moderate-scale deployment case in hospital are all considered. Simulation results show that with 20% duty cycle, only 68.5% of data transmission can achieve the targeted reliability requirement (PER is less than 0.05) even in the off-peak period in hospital. We then suggest some interference mitigation schemes based on the performance evaluation results in the case study. © 2015 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
dc.publisherMDPI AG
dc.sourceUnpaywall 20200831
dc.subjectBody sensor networks
dc.subjectHospitals
dc.subjectInterference suppression
dc.subjectWearable technology
dc.subjectHealthcare technology
dc.subjectHospital environment
dc.subjectInter-user interference
dc.subjectInterference mitigation
dc.subjectPacket error rates
dc.subjectReliability requirements
dc.subjectRemote health monitoring
dc.subjectWearable sensor systems
dc.subjectWearable sensors
dc.subjectambulatory monitoring
dc.subjectartifact
dc.subjectcomputer network
dc.subjectdevices
dc.subjectenvironment
dc.subjectequipment design
dc.subjectgenetic procedures
dc.subjecthospital
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectmobile application
dc.subjectreproducibility
dc.subjectsignal noise ratio
dc.subjecttelemetry
dc.subjectwireless communication
dc.subjectArtifacts
dc.subjectBiosensing Techniques
dc.subjectComputer Communication Networks
dc.subjectEnvironment
dc.subjectEquipment Design
dc.subjectHospitals
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMobile Applications
dc.subjectMonitoring, Ambulatory
dc.subjectReproducibility of Results
dc.subjectSignal-To-Noise Ratio
dc.subjectTelemetry
dc.subjectWireless Technology
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentDEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE
dc.contributor.departmentELECTRICAL AND COMPUTER ENGINEERING
dc.description.doi10.3390/s151024977
dc.description.sourcetitleSensors (Switzerland)
dc.description.volume15
dc.description.issue10
dc.description.page24977-24995
dc.published.statePublished
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_3390_s151024977.pdf634.6 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.