Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-04352-x
DC FieldValue
dc.titleSingle molecule and multiple bond characterization of catch bond associated cytoadhesion in malaria
dc.contributor.authorLim, Y.B
dc.contributor.authorThingna, J
dc.contributor.authorCao, J
dc.contributor.authorLim, C.T
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-09T04:55:15Z
dc.date.available2020-09-09T04:55:15Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationLim, Y.B, Thingna, J, Cao, J, Lim, C.T (2017). Single molecule and multiple bond characterization of catch bond associated cytoadhesion in malaria. Scientific Reports 7 (1) : 4208. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-04352-x
dc.identifier.issn20452322
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/175183
dc.description.abstractThe adhesion of malaria infected red blood cells (iRBCs) to host endothelial receptors in the microvasculature, or cytoadhesion, is associated with severe disease pathology such as multiple organ failure and cerebral malaria. Malaria iRBCs have been shown to bind to several receptors, of which intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1) upregulation in brain microvasculature is the only one correlated to cerebral malaria. We utilize a biophysical approach to study the interactions between iRBCs and ICAM-1. At the single molecule level, force spectroscopy experiments reveal that ICAM-1 forms catch bond interactions with Plasmodium falciparum parasite iRBCs. Flow experiments are subsequently conducted to understand multiple bond behavior. Using a robust model that smoothly transitions between our single and multiple bond results, we conclusively demonstrate that the catch bond behavior persists even under flow conditions. The parameters extracted from these experimental results revealed that the rate of association of iRBC-ICAM-1 bonds are ten times lower than iRBC-CD36 (cluster of differentiation 36), a receptor that shows no upregulation in the brains of cerebral malaria patients. Yet, the dissociation rates are nearly the same for both iRBC-receptor interactions. Thus, our results suggest that ICAM-1 may not be the sole mediator responsible for cytoadhesion in the brain. © The Author(s) 2017.
dc.sourceUnpaywall 20200831
dc.subjectintercellular adhesion molecule 1
dc.subjectatomic force microscopy
dc.subjectflow kinetics
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectmalaria falciparum
dc.subjectmetabolism
dc.subjectspectroscopy
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectIntercellular Adhesion Molecule-1
dc.subjectMalaria, Falciparum
dc.subjectMicroscopy, Atomic Force
dc.subjectRheology
dc.subjectSpectrum Analysis
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentBIOENGINEERING
dc.description.doi10.1038/s41598-017-04352-x
dc.description.sourcetitleScientific Reports
dc.description.volume7
dc.description.issue1
dc.description.page4208
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1038_s41598-017-04352-x.pdf2.14 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.