Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.3390/en10122061
DC FieldValue
dc.titleInsertion of mono- vs. Bi- vs. trivalent atoms in prospective active electrode materials for electrochemical batteries: An ab initio perspective
dc.contributor.authorKulish, V.V
dc.contributor.authorKoch, D
dc.contributor.authorManzhos, S
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-04T02:26:07Z
dc.date.available2020-09-04T02:26:07Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationKulish, V.V, Koch, D, Manzhos, S (2017). Insertion of mono- vs. Bi- vs. trivalent atoms in prospective active electrode materials for electrochemical batteries: An ab initio perspective. Energies 10 (12) : 2061. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10122061
dc.identifier.issn1996-1073
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/174369
dc.description.abstractRational design of active electrode materials is important for the development of advanced lithium and post-lithium batteries. Ab initio modeling can provide mechanistic understanding of the performance of prospective materials and guide design. We review our recent comparative ab initio studies of lithium, sodium, potassium, magnesium, and aluminum interactions with different phases of several actively experimentally studied electrode materials, including monoelemental materials carbon, silicon, tin, and germanium, oxides TiO2 and VxOy as well as sulphur-based spinels MS2 (M = transition metal). These studies are unique in that they provided reliable comparisons, i.e., at the same level of theory and using the same computational parameters, among different materials and among Li, Na, K, Mg, and Al. Specifically, insertion energetics (related to the electrode voltage) and diffusion barriers (related to rate capability), as well as phononic effects, are compared. These studies facilitate identification of phases most suitable as anode or cathode for different types of batteries. We highlight the possibility of increasing the voltage, or enabling electrochemical activity, by amorphization and p-doping, of rational choice of phases of oxides to maximize the insertion potential of Li, Na, K, Mg, Al, as well as of rational choice of the optimum sulfur-based spinel for Mg and Al insertion, based on ab initio calculations. Some methodological issues are also addressed, including construction of effective localized basis sets, applications of Hubbard correction, generation of amorphous structures, and the use of a posteriori dispersion corrections. © 2017 by the authors.
dc.publisherMDPI AG
dc.sourceUnpaywall 20200831
dc.subjectAnodes
dc.subjectCalculations
dc.subjectCathodes
dc.subjectComputation theory
dc.subjectDiffusion
dc.subjectDispersions
dc.subjectElectrochemical electrodes
dc.subjectEnergy storage
dc.subjectIntercalation
dc.subjectMetal ions
dc.subjectSodium-ion batteries
dc.subjectSulfur
dc.subjectTin oxides
dc.subjectTitanium dioxide
dc.subjectTransition metals
dc.subjectAb initio modeling
dc.subjectActive electrode materials
dc.subjectComputational parameters
dc.subjectElectrochemical activities
dc.subjectElectrochemical batteries
dc.subjectIon batteries
dc.subjectMagnesium ions
dc.subjectPotassium ions
dc.subjectLithium-ion batteries
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentMECHANICAL ENGINEERING
dc.description.doi10.3390/en10122061
dc.description.sourcetitleEnergies
dc.description.volume10
dc.description.issue12
dc.description.page2061
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_3390_en10122061.pdf6 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.