Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.3390/en11051198
DC FieldValue
dc.titleTechnology and instrument constituencies as agents of innovation: Sustainability transitions and the governance of urban transport
dc.contributor.authorGoyal, N
dc.contributor.authorHowlett, M
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-04T02:24:37Z
dc.date.available2020-09-04T02:24:37Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationGoyal, N, Howlett, M (2018). Technology and instrument constituencies as agents of innovation: Sustainability transitions and the governance of urban transport. Energies 11 (5) : 1198. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11051198
dc.identifier.issn1996-1073
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/174362
dc.description.abstractSustainable urban transport is a complex challenge requiring innovation in technologies, culture, and policies. Given the systemic nature of the issues involved, numerous studies have applied the transitions approach to urban transport. However, relatively weak conceptualization of agency in the transitions literature limits the usefulness of this approach for the governance of urban transport. The objective of this study is to contribute to the conceptualization of agency in the multilevel perspective to sustainability transitions. We propose that two types of actors exercise agency to foster innovation: technology constituencies, who promote the adoption of specific technologies by citizens, businesses, or governments; and instrument constituencies, who promote the adoption of specific policy instruments. In focusing predominantly on technological innovation, the transitions literature has generally juxtaposed these constituencies or considered them to be the same. We posit that the two constitute distinct, albeit possibly overlapping, actors and that their relationship(s) help better understand and explain how transitions evolve. We discuss the implications of this distinction for the governance of urban transport and argue that the presence of instrument and technology constituencies, and their relationship(s), should be examined empirically in future research. © 2018 by the authors.
dc.publisherMDPI AG
dc.sourceUnpaywall 20200831
dc.subjectPublic policy
dc.subjectSustainable development
dc.subjectAgency
dc.subjectGovernance
dc.subjectInnovation journeys
dc.subjectMultilevel perspective
dc.subjectPolicy integration
dc.subjectSocio-technical transitions
dc.subjectUrban mobility
dc.subjectUrban transport
dc.subjectUrban transportation
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentDEAN'S OFFICE (YALE-NUS COLLEGE)
dc.contributor.departmentLEE KUAN YEW SCHOOL OF PUBLIC POLICY
dc.description.doi10.3390/en11051198
dc.description.sourcetitleEnergies
dc.description.volume11
dc.description.issue5
dc.description.page1198
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_3390_en11051198.pdf247.83 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.