Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-014-0173-x
DC FieldValue
dc.titleNurse-led home visitation programme to improve health-related quality of life and reduce disability among potentially frail community-dwelling older people in general practice: A theory-based process evaluation
dc.contributor.authorStijnen M.M.N.
dc.contributor.authorJansen M.W.J.
dc.contributor.authorDuimel-Peeters I.G.P.
dc.contributor.authorVrijhoef H.J.M.
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-04T02:14:41Z
dc.date.available2020-09-04T02:14:41Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationStijnen M.M.N., Jansen M.W.J., Duimel-Peeters I.G.P., Vrijhoef H.J.M. (2014). Nurse-led home visitation programme to improve health-related quality of life and reduce disability among potentially frail community-dwelling older people in general practice: A theory-based process evaluation. BMC Family Practice 15 (1) : 173. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-014-0173-x
dc.identifier.issn14712296
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/174308
dc.description.abstractBackground: Population ageing fosters new models of care delivery for older people that are increasingly integrated into existing care systems. In the Netherlands, a primary-care based preventive home visitation programme has been developed for potentially frail community-dwelling older people (aged ?75 years), consisting of a comprehensive geriatric assessment during a home visit by a practice nurse followed by targeted interdisciplinary care and follow-up over time. A theory-based process evaluation was designed to examine (1) the extent to which the home visitation programme was implemented as planned and (2) the extent to which general practices successfully redesigned their care delivery. Methods: Using a mixed-methods approach, the focus was on fidelity (quality of implementation), dose delivered (completeness), dose received (exposure and satisfaction), reach (participation rate), recruitment, and context. Twenty-four general practices participated, of which 13 implemented the home visitation programme and 11 delivered usual care to older people. Data collection consisted of semi-structured interviews with practice nurses (PNs), general practitioners (GPs), and older people; feedback meetings with PNs; structured registration forms filled-out by PNs; and narrative descriptions of the recruitment procedures and registration of inclusion and drop-outs by members of the research team. Results: Fidelity of implementation was acceptable, but time constraints and inadequate reach (i.e., the relatively healthy older people participated) negatively influenced complete delivery of protocol elements, such as interdisciplinary cooperation and follow-up of older people over time. The home visitation programme was judged positively by PNs, GPs, and older people. Useful tools were offered to general practices for organising proactive geriatric care. Conclusions: The home visitation programme did not have major shortcomings in itself, but the delivery offered room for improvement. General practices received useful tools to redesign their care delivery from reactive towards proactive care, but perceived barriers require attention to allow for sustainability of the home visitation programme over time. © 2014 Stijnen et al.
dc.publisherBioMed Central Ltd.
dc.sourceUnpaywall 20200831
dc.subjectadult
dc.subjectadvanced practice nursing
dc.subjectaged
dc.subjectfemale
dc.subjectfrail elderly
dc.subjectgeneral practice
dc.subjectgeriatric assessment
dc.subjectgeriatric nursing
dc.subjecthealth care quality
dc.subjecthealth personnel attitude
dc.subjecthealth status
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectindependent living
dc.subjectmale
dc.subjectmiddle aged
dc.subjectnursing practice
dc.subjectprocedures
dc.subjectprofessional practice
dc.subjectquality of life
dc.subjectvery elderly
dc.subjectyoung adult
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAdvanced Practice Nursing
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectAged, 80 and over
dc.subjectAttitude of Health Personnel
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectFrail Elderly
dc.subjectGeneral Practice
dc.subjectGeriatric Assessment
dc.subjectGeriatric Nursing
dc.subjectHealth Status
dc.subjectHouse Calls
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectIndependent Living
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectPractice Patterns, Nurses'
dc.subjectProcess Assessment (Health Care)
dc.subjectQuality of Life
dc.subjectYoung Adult
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentSAW SWEE HOCK SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
dc.description.doi10.1186/s12875-014-0173-x
dc.description.sourcetitleBMC Family Practice
dc.description.volume15
dc.description.issue1
dc.description.page173
dc.published.statePublished
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1186_s12875-014-0173-x.pdf1.55 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.