Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-1231-3
Title: Context, mechanisms and outcomes of integrated care for diabetes mellitus type 2: A systematic review
Authors: Busetto L.
Luijkx K.G.
Elissen A.M.J.
Vrijhoef H.J.M. 
Keywords: chronic disease
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
electronic health record
health care personnel
human
integrated health care system
job satisfaction
outcome assessment
psychology
Chronic Disease
Delivery of Health Care, Integrated
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Electronic Health Records
Health Personnel
Humans
Job Satisfaction
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Issue Date: 2016
Publisher: BioMed Central Ltd.
Citation: Busetto L., Luijkx K.G., Elissen A.M.J., Vrijhoef H.J.M. (2016). Context, mechanisms and outcomes of integrated care for diabetes mellitus type 2: A systematic review. BMC Health Services Research 16 (1) : 1231. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-1231-3
Abstract: Background: Integrated care interventions for chronic conditions can lead to improved outcomes, but it is not clear when and why this is the case. This study aims to answer the following two research questions: First, what are the context, mechanisms and outcomes of integrated care for people with type 2 diabetes? Second, what are the relationships between context, mechanisms and outcomes of integrated care for people with type 2 diabetes? Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted for the period 2003-2013 in Cochrane and PubMed. Articles were included when they focussed on integrated care and type 2 diabetes, and concerned empirical research analysing the implementation of an intervention. Data extraction was performed using a common data extraction table. The quality of the studies was assessed with the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. The CMO model (context + mechanism = outcome) was used to study the relationship between context factors (described by the barriers and facilitators encountered in the implementation process and categorised at the six levels of the Implementation Model), mechanisms (defined as intervention types and described by their number of Chronic Care Model (sub-)components) and outcomes (the intentional and unintentional effects triggered by mechanism and context). Results: Thirty-two studies met the inclusion criteria. Most reported barriers to the implementation process were found at the organisational context level and most facilitators at the social context level. Due to the low number of articles reporting comparable quantitative outcome measures or in-depth qualitative information, it was not possible to make statements about the relationship between context, mechanisms and outcomes. Conclusions: Efficient resource allocation should entail increased investments at the organisational context level where most barriers are expected to occur. It is likely that investments at the social context level will also help to decrease the development of barriers at the organisational context level, especially by increasing staff involvement and satisfaction. If future research is to adequately inform practice and policy regarding the impact of these efforts on health outcomes, focus on the actual relationships between context, mechanisms and outcomes should be actively incorporated into study designs. © 2016 Busetto et al.
Source Title: BMC Health Services Research
URI: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/174264
ISSN: 14726963
DOI: 10.1186/s12913-015-1231-3
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1186_s12913-015-1231-3.pdf1.03 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.