Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1266-0
DC FieldValue
dc.titleThe impact of redesigning care processes on quality of care: A systematic review
dc.contributor.authorVan Leijen-Zeelenberg J.E.
dc.contributor.authorElissen A.M.J.
dc.contributor.authorGrube K.
dc.contributor.authorVan Raak A.J.A.
dc.contributor.authorVrijhoef H.J.M.
dc.contributor.authorKremer B.
dc.contributor.authorRuwaard D.
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-04T02:05:58Z
dc.date.available2020-09-04T02:05:58Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationVan Leijen-Zeelenberg J.E., Elissen A.M.J., Grube K., Van Raak A.J.A., Vrijhoef H.J.M., Kremer B., Ruwaard D. (2016). The impact of redesigning care processes on quality of care: A systematic review. BMC Health Services Research 16 (1) : 19. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1266-0
dc.identifier.issn14726963
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/174263
dc.description.abstractBackground: This literature review evaluates the current state of knowledge about the impact of process redesign on the quality of healthcare. Methods: Pubmed, CINAHL, Web of Science and Business Premier Source were searched for relevant studies published in the last ten years [2004-2014]. To be included, studies had to be original research, published in English with a before-and-after study design, and be focused on changes in healthcare processes and quality of care. Studies that met the inclusion criteria were independently assessed for excellence in reporting by three reviewers using the SQUIRE checklist. Data was extracted using a framework developed for this review. Results: Reporting adequacy varied across the studies. Process redesign interventions were diverse, and none of the studies described their effects on all dimensions of quality defined by the Institute of Medicine. Conclusions: The results of this systematic literature review suggests that process redesign interventions have positive effects on certain aspects of quality. However, the full impact cannot be determined on the basis of the literature. A wide range of outcome measures were used, and research methods were limited. This review demonstrates the need for further investigation of the impact of redesign interventions on the quality of healthcare. © 2016 van Leijen-Zeelenberg et al.
dc.publisherBioMed Central Ltd.
dc.sourceUnpaywall 20200831
dc.subjectchecklist
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectmedicine
dc.subjectsystematic review
dc.subjecthealth care delivery
dc.subjecthealth care quality
dc.subjectmethodology
dc.subjectorganization and management
dc.subjectoutcome assessment
dc.subjectstandards
dc.subjecttotal quality management
dc.subjecttreatment outcome
dc.subjectChecklist
dc.subjectDelivery of Health Care
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectOutcome and Process Assessment (Health Care)
dc.subjectOutcome Assessment (Health Care)
dc.subjectQuality Improvement
dc.subjectQuality of Health Care
dc.subjectResearch Design
dc.typeReview
dc.contributor.departmentSAW SWEE HOCK SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
dc.description.doi10.1186/s12913-016-1266-0
dc.description.sourcetitleBMC Health Services Research
dc.description.volume16
dc.description.issue1
dc.description.page19
dc.published.statePublished
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1186_s12913-016-1266-0.pdf798.57 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.