Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-016-0243-0
DC FieldValue
dc.titleProjecting the effects of long-term care policy on the labor market participation of primary informal family caregivers of elderly with disability: Insights from a dynamic simulation model
dc.contributor.authorAnsah J.P.
dc.contributor.authorMatchar D.B.
dc.contributor.authorMalhotra R.
dc.contributor.authorLove S.R.
dc.contributor.authorLiu C.
dc.contributor.authorDo Y.
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-04T02:05:49Z
dc.date.available2020-09-04T02:05:49Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationAnsah J.P., Matchar D.B., Malhotra R., Love S.R., Liu C., Do Y. (2016). Projecting the effects of long-term care policy on the labor market participation of primary informal family caregivers of elderly with disability: Insights from a dynamic simulation model. BMC Geriatrics 16 (1) : 243. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-016-0243-0
dc.identifier.issn14712318
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/174262
dc.description.abstractBackground: Using Singapore as a case study, this paper aims to understand the effects of the current long-term care policy and various alternative policy options on the labor market participation of primary informal family caregivers of elderly with disability. Methods: A model of the long-term care system in Singapore was developed using System Dynamics methodology. Results: Under the current long-term care policy, by 2030, 6.9 percent of primary informal family caregivers (0.34 percent of the domestic labor supply) are expected to withdraw from the labor market. Alternative policy options reduce primary informal family caregiver labor market withdrawal; however, the number of workers required to scale up long-term care services is greater than the number of caregivers who can be expected to return to the labor market. Conclusions: Policymakers may face a dilemma between admitting more foreign workers to provide long-term care services and depending on primary informal family caregivers. © 2016 Ansah et al.
dc.publisherBioMed Central Ltd.
dc.sourceUnpaywall 20200831
dc.subjectaged
dc.subjectcaregiver
dc.subjectdisabled person
dc.subjectfemale
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectlong term care
dc.subjectmale
dc.subjectmanagement
dc.subjectmanpower
dc.subjectorganization and management
dc.subjectrehabilitation
dc.subjectSingapore
dc.subjectvery elderly
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectAged, 80 and over
dc.subjectCaregivers
dc.subjectDisabled Persons
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectLong-Term Care
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectPolicy Making
dc.subjectSingapore
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentDUKE-NUS MEDICAL SCHOOL
dc.description.doi10.1186/s12877-016-0243-0
dc.description.sourcetitleBMC Geriatrics
dc.description.volume16
dc.description.issue1
dc.description.page243
dc.published.statePublished
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1186_s12877-016-0243-0.pdf1.4 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.