Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1177/194008291500800116
DC FieldValue
dc.titleInvasive trees in Singapore: Are they a threat to native forests?
dc.contributor.authorNghiem L.T.P.
dc.contributor.authorTan H.T.W.
dc.contributor.authorCorlett R.T.
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-03T10:38:50Z
dc.date.available2020-09-03T10:38:50Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationNghiem L.T.P., Tan H.T.W., Corlett R.T. (2015). Invasive trees in Singapore: Are they a threat to native forests?. Tropical Conservation Science 8 (1) : 201-214. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1177/194008291500800116
dc.identifier.issn19400829
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/174148
dc.description.abstractAsian tropical forests are under extreme stress from clearance, fragmentation, and logging. Because Singapore suffered these same impacts in the 19th century, it can act as an early warning system for the region. We identified invasive exotic tree species from a comprehensive survey, assessed their survival and growth in the open and under a forest canopy, and compared their traits with native pioneers and widely planted exotic species that have failed to naturalize. Nine species were invasive: Acacia auriculiformis (ear-leaf acacia), Cecropia pachystachya (trumpet tree), Falcataria moluccana (Moluccan albizia), Leucaena leucocephala (leucaena), Manihot carthaginensis subp. glaziovii (Ceara rubber tree), Muntingia calabura (Jamaican cherry tree), Piper aduncum (spiked pepper), Pipturus argenteus (white mulberry), and Spathodea campanulata (African tulip tree). Under the forest canopy, all grew little and suffered high (75-100%) mortality, with Spathodea surviving best. At the open site, mortality was low (0-25%) and height growth rapid (1.6-8.6 cm wk-1), with Leucaena growing fastest. The only significant trait difference between native pioneer trees and invasive exotics was the dispersal syndrome; none of the common native pioneers are wind dispersed, while two invasive species are. Among exotics, there were highly significant differences between invasive and non-invasive species in wood density and seed size, with invasive species having only 54% of the mean wood density and 19% of the dry seed mass of non-invasive species. Invasive exotics were also significantly farther from their native ranges than non-invasive species. None of these invasive tree species is a direct threat to the integrity of native closed-canopy forest, but they dominate on newly abandoned land and may pre-empt the recovery of native forest on such sites. © Le T. P. Nghiem, Hugh T. W. Tan and Richard T. Corlett.
dc.sourceUnpaywall 20200831
dc.subjectAcacia
dc.subjectAcacia auriculiformis
dc.subjectAlbizia
dc.subjectCecropia obtusifolia
dc.subjectCecropia pachystachya
dc.subjectFalcataria moluccana
dc.subjectHevea brasiliensis
dc.subjectLeucaena
dc.subjectLeucaena leucocephala
dc.subjectManihot
dc.subjectMorus alba
dc.subjectMuntingia calabura
dc.subjectPiper aduncum
dc.subjectPipturus
dc.subjectSpathodea
dc.subjectSpathodea campanulata
dc.subjectTulipa
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentBIOLOGICAL SCIENCES
dc.description.doi10.1177/194008291500800116
dc.description.sourcetitleTropical Conservation Science
dc.description.volume8
dc.description.issue1
dc.description.page201-214
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1177_194008291500800116.pdf483.91 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.