Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.21019
DC FieldValue
dc.titleImpact of epidermal growth factor receptor sensitizing mutations on outcomes of patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with definitive thoracic radiation therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
dc.contributor.authorSoon, Y.Y
dc.contributor.authorVellayappan, B
dc.contributor.authorTey, J.C.S
dc.contributor.authorLeong, C.N
dc.contributor.authorKoh, W.Y
dc.contributor.authorTham, I.W.K
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-01T00:56:59Z
dc.date.available2020-09-01T00:56:59Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationSoon, Y.Y, Vellayappan, B, Tey, J.C.S, Leong, C.N, Koh, W.Y, Tham, I.W.K (2017). Impact of epidermal growth factor receptor sensitizing mutations on outcomes of patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with definitive thoracic radiation therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncotarget 8 (65) : 109712-109722. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.21019
dc.identifier.issn19492553
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/173798
dc.description.abstractBackground: To determine if the presence of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) sensitizing mutations improves tumor control and survival outcomes in patients with non-metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received definitive thoracic radiation therapy (TRT) with or without chemotherapy. Materials and Methods: We searched MEDLINE for eligible comparative studies which compared the outcomes of patients treated with definitive TRT according to EGFR mutation status. Meta-analysis was performed using random effects model. Outcomes of interest were tumor overall response rate (ORR), loco-regional (LRR), distant recurrence rates (DRR), relapse-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS) and adverse events (AE). Results: We found seven studies including 537 patients with stage III NSCLC. Up to 45% of patients in the studies had mutations in exon 19 and 21. Patients harbouring EGFR sensitizing mutations had a trend towards improvement in ORR (risk ratio 1.17, 95% confidence interval 0.99-1.37, P = 0.06) compared to EGFR wild type status. There were no significant differences in LRR, DRR, RFS, OS and AE outcomes between the EGFR mutant and EGFR wild type groups. Conclusions: The presence of EGFR sensitizing mutations may improve tumour response rate but not survival in patients with localized NSCLC treated with definitive thoracic radiation therapy with or without chemotherapy. © Soon et al.
dc.sourceUnpaywall 20200831
dc.subjectepidermal growth factor receptor
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectcancer chemotherapy
dc.subjectcancer control
dc.subjectcancer radiotherapy
dc.subjectcancer staging
dc.subjectcancer survival
dc.subjectesophagitis
dc.subjectexon
dc.subjectgene mutation
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectmeta analysis
dc.subjectnon small cell lung cancer
dc.subjectoutcome assessment
dc.subjectoverall survival
dc.subjectpneumonia
dc.subjectrecurrence free survival
dc.subjectrecurrence risk
dc.subjectskin toxicity
dc.subjectsystematic review
dc.subjecttreatment response
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentMEDICINE
dc.description.doi10.18632/oncotarget.21019
dc.description.sourcetitleOncotarget
dc.description.volume8
dc.description.issue65
dc.description.page109712-109722
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_18632_oncotarget_21019.pdf6.08 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.