Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2016.1155991
DC FieldValue
dc.titleCognitive flexibility and changes in hopelessness across time: A moderation hypothesis
dc.contributor.authorYu, Junhong
dc.contributor.authorLee, Tatia MC
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-28T11:31:57Z
dc.date.available2020-08-28T11:31:57Z
dc.date.issued2017-01-01
dc.identifier.citationYu, Junhong, Lee, Tatia MC (2017-01-01). Cognitive flexibility and changes in hopelessness across time: A moderation hypothesis. APPLIED NEUROPSYCHOLOGY-ADULT 24 (5) : 404-409. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2016.1155991
dc.identifier.issn23279095
dc.identifier.issn23279109
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/173591
dc.description.abstract© 2017 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. Prior literature has suggested that cognitive flexibility is implicated in the feeling of hopelessness. However, studies on the nature of their relationship have been scarce. This study posits a moderation hypothesis on the relationship between cognitive flexibility and hopelessness. A total of 78 elderly participants (Mage = 70, SD = 6.1) were administered a self-report measure of hopelessness across two time points approximately 10 months apart and a measure of cognitive flexibility. We hypothesized that baseline hopelessness scores would moderate the relationship between cognitive flexibility and hopelessness scores 10 months later. Specifically, among the high baseline hopelessness group, we predicted that cognitively flexible participants would report lower hopelessness scores 10 months later. However, for the low baseline hopelessness group, cognitive flexibility would be unrelated to hopelessness scores 10 months later. The results of a bootstrapped moderation analysis controlling for age, sex, education, and general cognitive status supported our moderation hypothesis and predictions. These findings reveal the complex nature of the relationship between cognitive flexibility and hopelessness. The implications of these findings in the wider clinical context were discussed.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
dc.sourceElements
dc.subjectScience & Technology
dc.subjectSocial Sciences
dc.subjectLife Sciences & Biomedicine
dc.subjectClinical Neurology
dc.subjectPsychology
dc.subjectNeurosciences & Neurology
dc.subjectAging
dc.subjectcognitive flexibility
dc.subjectelderly
dc.subjectloneliness
dc.subjectStroop
dc.subjectPREFRONTAL CORTEX
dc.subjectDEPRESSION
dc.subjectCHINESE
dc.subjectSCALE
dc.subjectPESSIMISM
dc.subjectIDEATION
dc.subjectTASKS
dc.subjectOLDER
dc.typeArticle
dc.date.updated2020-08-28T08:02:14Z
dc.contributor.departmentPSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE
dc.description.doi10.1080/23279095.2016.1155991
dc.description.sourcetitleAPPLIED NEUROPSYCHOLOGY-ADULT
dc.description.volume24
dc.description.issue5
dc.description.page404-409
dc.published.statePublished
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
CogHopeACCEPTED.pdfAccepted version260.05 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

Post-printView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.