Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-020-0776-5
DC Field | Value | |
---|---|---|
dc.title | Do we have enough ophthalmologists to manage vision-threatening diabetic retinopathy? A global perspective | |
dc.contributor.author | Teo, Zhen Ling | |
dc.contributor.author | Tham, Yih-Chung | |
dc.contributor.author | Yu, Marco | |
dc.contributor.author | Cheng, Ching-Yu | |
dc.contributor.author | Wong, Tien Yin | |
dc.contributor.author | Sabanayagam, Charumathi | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-08-19T13:43:21Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-08-19T13:43:21Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020-01-28 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Teo, Zhen Ling, Tham, Yih-Chung, Yu, Marco, Cheng, Ching-Yu, Wong, Tien Yin, Sabanayagam, Charumathi (2020-01-28). Do we have enough ophthalmologists to manage vision-threatening diabetic retinopathy? A global perspective. EYE. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-020-0776-5 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0950222X | |
dc.identifier.issn | 14765454 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/173151 | |
dc.description.abstract | © 2020, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to The Royal College of Ophthalmologists. We aimed to estimate the supply of ophthalmologists in relation to the global and regional burden of vision-threatening diabetic retinopathy (VTDR). Diabetes mellitus (DM) population data from seven world regions were obtained from the International Diabetes Federation Atlas 2017. A systematic review was performed to include population-, community-based studies that reported country-specific VTDR prevalence. Random effect meta-analysis was then performed to estimate global and regional VTDR prevalence. VTDR prevalence estimates coupled with DM population data were then used to estimate the number of VTDR cases. Global and regional number of ophthalmologists were derived from the International Council of Ophthalmology Report 2015. Fifty studies (17 from Western Pacific [WP], nine North America and Caribbean [NAC], nine Middle East and North Africa [MENA], five Europe, eight South East Asia [SEA], one South and Central America [SACA] and one from Africa) were included. Global VTDR prevalence was 7.26% (95% CI, 6.18–8.32%). Regional VTDR prevalence was 14.35% in Africa, 11.21% in MENA, 10.00% in NAC, 6.32% in Europe, 6.22% in WP, 5.83% in SACA and 2.97% in SEA. Globally, there were 7.16 ophthalmologists per 1000 VTDR patients. Europe had the highest ophthalmologist per 1000 VTDR patient ratio at 18.03 followed by SACA (17.41), while NAC, MENA and Africa had the lowest at 4.90, 4.81 and 0.91 respectively. Across regions, the ophthalmologist densities ranged from 0.91 to 18.03 per 1000 VTDR patients, with NAC, MENA and Africa having less than 5 ophthalmologists per 1000 patients. These findings will aid global and regional policy planning and healthcare resource allocation for VTDR management. | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP | |
dc.source | Elements | |
dc.subject | Science & Technology | |
dc.subject | Life Sciences & Biomedicine | |
dc.subject | Ophthalmology | |
dc.subject | PANRETINAL PHOTOCOAGULATION | |
dc.subject | INTRAVITREOUS RANIBIZUMAB | |
dc.subject | COST-EFFECTIVENESS | |
dc.subject | SCREENING-PROGRAM | |
dc.subject | PREVALENCE | |
dc.subject | TELEMEDICINE | |
dc.type | Review | |
dc.date.updated | 2020-06-03T10:39:15Z | |
dc.contributor.department | DUKE-NUS MEDICAL SCHOOL | |
dc.description.doi | 10.1038/s41433-020-0776-5 | |
dc.description.sourcetitle | EYE | |
dc.published.state | Published | |
Appears in Collections: | Elements Staff Publications |
Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | Access Settings | Version | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Do we have enough Ophthalmologists_Eye.pdf | Published version | 895.48 kB | Adobe PDF | CLOSED | None |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.