Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1093/pq/pqaa006
DC FieldValue
dc.titleCertainty in Action
dc.contributor.authorBeddor, Bob
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-27T02:51:30Z
dc.date.available2020-07-27T02:51:30Z
dc.date.issued2020-03-14
dc.identifier.citationBeddor, Bob (2020-03-14). Certainty in Action. The Philosophical Quarterly. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1093/pq/pqaa006
dc.identifier.issn00318094
dc.identifier.issn14679213
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/171702
dc.description.abstract<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>When is it permissible to rely on a proposition in practical reasoning? Standard answers to this question face serious challenges. This paper uses these challenges to motivate a certainty norm of practical reasoning. This norm holds that one is permitted to rely on p in practical reasoning if and only if p is epistemically certain. After developing and defending this norm, I consider its broader implications. Taking a certainty norm seriously calls into question traditional assumptions about the importance of belief and knowledge. In particular, it raises the possibility that many epistemological jobs that are usually assigned to belief and knowledge should be reallocated to two related but importantly different states: psychological and epistemic certainty.</jats:p>
dc.publisherOxford University Press (OUP)
dc.sourceElements
dc.typeArticle
dc.date.updated2020-07-24T03:29:53Z
dc.contributor.departmentPHILOSOPHY
dc.description.doi10.1093/pq/pqaa006
dc.description.sourcetitleThe Philosophical Quarterly
dc.published.statePublished
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
certainty_in_action_final.pdf450.23 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

Post-printView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.