Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2020.04.021
DC Field | Value | |
---|---|---|
dc.title | A comprehensive study on the electrolyte, anode and cathode for developing commercial type non-flammable sodium-ion battery | |
dc.contributor.author | DU KANG | |
dc.contributor.author | WANG CHEN | |
dc.contributor.author | Subasinghe, LU | |
dc.contributor.author | Gajella, SR | |
dc.contributor.author | MARKAS LAW LEE LAM | |
dc.contributor.author | ASHISH RUDOLA | |
dc.contributor.author | PALANI BALAYA | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-06-15T06:20:48Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-06-15T06:20:48Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020-08-01 | |
dc.identifier.citation | DU KANG, WANG CHEN, Subasinghe, LU, Gajella, SR, MARKAS LAW LEE LAM, ASHISH RUDOLA, PALANI BALAYA (2020-08-01). A comprehensive study on the electrolyte, anode and cathode for developing commercial type non-flammable sodium-ion battery. Energy Storage Materials 29 : 287-299. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2020.04.021 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2405-8297 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/169770 | |
dc.description.abstract | Here, we present a comprehensive study of choice of electrolyte, anode and cathode to develop commercially viable non-flammable sodium-ion battery. We report hard carbon (HC) vs. Na using ether-based non-flammable electrolyte (1 M NaBF4 in tetraglyme) and compare storage performance, thermal stability and SEI formation with those obtained using carbonate-based electrolyte (1 M NaClO4 in EC:PC = 1:1 v/v). The results shows that 1 M NaBF4 in tetraglyme works as a better electrolyte than carbonate-based electrolyte for HC anode. We present and compare storage performances of pristine and aliovalent-doped Na3V2(PO4)3 (NVP) vs. Na. Doped-NVP outperforms pristine cathode in terms of specific capacity and rate capability. 18650-type non-flammable sodium-ion cells fabricated using modified NVP vs. HC exhibits energy density of 60 Wh kg−1. When discharged at a high rate close to 5C, the cell successfully retains 83% of its storage capacity obtained at low rate. When cycled at C/5, doped NVP vs. HC 18650 cell retains 90% of its initial capacity after 200 cycles. | |
dc.publisher | Elsevier BV | |
dc.source | Elements | |
dc.type | Article | |
dc.date.updated | 2020-06-12T12:19:37Z | |
dc.contributor.department | MECHANICAL ENGINEERING | |
dc.description.doi | 10.1016/j.ensm.2020.04.021 | |
dc.description.sourcetitle | Energy Storage Materials | |
dc.description.volume | 29 | |
dc.description.page | 287-299 | |
dc.published.state | Published | |
dc.description.redeposit | completed | |
Appears in Collections: | Elements Staff Publications |
Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | Access Settings | Version | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Energy Storage Materials_NVP HC NIB_April 2020.pdf | Accepted version | 2.48 MB | Adobe PDF | OPEN | Post-print | View/Download |
Energy Storage Materials_NVP HC NIB_SI.pdf | Accepted version | 1.05 MB | Adobe PDF | OPEN | Post-print | View/Download |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.