Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.12.020
DC FieldValue
dc.titleAcceptance and feasibility of school-based seasonal influenza vaccination in Singapore: A qualitative study
dc.contributor.authorOffeddu, Vittoria
dc.contributor.authorLow, Mabel Sheau Fong
dc.contributor.authorSurendran, Shilpa
dc.contributor.authorKembhavi, Gayatri
dc.contributor.authorTam, Clarence C
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-18T04:02:25Z
dc.date.available2019-12-18T04:02:25Z
dc.date.issued2019-12
dc.identifier.citationOffeddu, Vittoria, Low, Mabel Sheau Fong, Surendran, Shilpa, Kembhavi, Gayatri, Tam, Clarence C (2019-12). Acceptance and feasibility of school-based seasonal influenza vaccination in Singapore: A qualitative study. Vaccine. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.12.020
dc.identifier.issn0264410X
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/162809
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Influenza is a major cause of disease in children. School-based seasonal influenza vaccination can be a cost-effective tool to improve vaccine uptake among children, and can bring substantial health and economic benefits to the broader community. The acceptance and feasibility of school-based influenza vaccination are likely to be highly context-specific, but limited data exist from tropical settings with year-round influenza transmission. We conducted a qualitative study to assess acceptability and feasibility of a school-based seasonal influenza vaccination programme in Singapore. Methods: We conducted qualitative in-depth interviews with key stakeholders, including healthcare professionals, representatives of relevant ministries, preschool principals and parents to understand their perspectives on a proposed school-based seasonal influenza vaccination programme. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis. Results: We conducted 40 interviews. Although preschool-aged children are currently the recommended age group for vaccination, stakeholders suggested introducing the programme in primary and/or secondary schools, where existing vaccination infrastructure would facilitate delivery. However, more comprehensive evidence on the local influenza burden and transmission patterns among children is required to develop an evidence-based, locally relevant rationale for a school-based vaccination programme and effectively engage policy-makers, school staff, and parents. Extensive, age-appropriate public education and awareness campaigns would increase the acceptability of the programme among stakeholders. Stakeholders indicated that an opt-out programme with free or subsidised vaccination would be the most likely to achieve high vaccine coverage and make access to vaccination more equitable. Conclusions: Overall, participants were supportive of a free or subsidised school-based influenza vaccination programme in primary and/or secondary schools, although children in this age group are not currently a recommended group for vaccination. However, a better informed, evidence-based rationale to estimate the programme’s impact in Singapore is currently lacking. Extensive, age-appropriate public education and awareness campaigns will help ensure full support across key stakeholder groups.
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.sourceElements
dc.subjectInfluenza
dc.subjectInfluenza vaccine
dc.subjectSchool-based vaccination
dc.typeArticle
dc.date.updated2019-12-18T03:53:36Z
dc.contributor.departmentDEAN'S OFFICE (SSH SCH OF PUBLIC HEALTH)
dc.contributor.departmentSAW SWEE HOCK SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
dc.description.doi10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.12.020
dc.description.sourcetitleVaccine
dc.published.statePublished
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
Offeddu_Vaccine_manuscript_R1_02_clean.pdfAccepted version344.08 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

Post-printView/Download

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

1
checked on Nov 23, 2022

Page view(s)

323
checked on Dec 1, 2022

Download(s)

3
checked on Dec 1, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons