Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2010.05.011
DC FieldValue
dc.titleComparative feasibility of myocardial velocity and strain measurements using two different methods with transesophageal echocardiography during cardiac surgery
dc.contributor.authorMacLaren G
dc.contributor.authorKluger R
dc.contributor.authorConnelly KA
dc.contributor.authorRoyse CF
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-11T08:22:42Z
dc.date.available2019-12-11T08:22:42Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.citationMacLaren G, Kluger R, Connelly KA, Royse CF (2011). Comparative feasibility of myocardial velocity and strain measurements using two different methods with transesophageal echocardiography during cardiac surgery. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia 25 (2) : 216-220. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2010.05.011
dc.identifier.issn10530770
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/162645
dc.description.abstractObjective: To assess the feasibility and correlation between tissue Doppler and speckle tracking imaging when measuring myocardial velocity, strain, and strain rate with transesophageal echocardiography. Design: A prospective, observational study. Setting: An academic tertiary-referral hospital. Participants: Patients undergoing elective heart surgery. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: Velocity, strain, and strain rate were measured using both techniques in the inferior and anterior walls in transgastric views for radial motion and in the lateral, septal, anterior, and inferior walls in midesophageal views for longitudinal motion. Nineteen patients and 304 myocardial segments were studied. Overall, tissue Doppler was found to be more successful than speckle tracking in measuring myocardial velocity, whereas strain and strain rate measurements were achieved with comparable success using either method. Tissue Doppler was more successful than speckle tracking for radial cardiac motion, and the highest success rates were achieved with this method (93.4% v 59.2% for velocity, p < 0.001; 78.9% v 59.2% for strain, p = 0.01; and 73.7% v 59.2% for strain rate, p = 0.09). Good correlation between tissue Doppler and speckle tracking was shown in 4 myocardial segments: radial midinferior, radial basal inferior, radial basal anterior, and longitudinal basal septum (R = 0.6-0.82, p < 0.05). Conclusions: The correlation between tissue Doppler and speckle tracking with transesophageal echocardiography appears valid when predominantly confined to segments moving in a radial direction adjacent to the ultrasound transducer. Tissue Doppler echocardiography of radial cardiac motion appears to be the most feasible technique of measuring myocardial velocity, strain, and strain rate during cardiac surgery.
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectTransesophageal echocardiographycardiac
dc.subjectCardiac surgery
dc.subjectTissue Doppler
dc.subjectStrain
dc.subjectStrain rate
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentSURGERY
dc.description.doi10.1053/j.jvca.2010.05.011
dc.description.sourcetitleJournal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
dc.description.volume25
dc.description.issue2
dc.description.page216-220
dc.description.codenJCVAE
dc.published.statePublished
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.