Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2019.77
DC FieldValue
dc.titleSolidarity in Diversity? State Responses to Religious Diversity in Liberal and Non-Liberal Perspectives
dc.contributor.authorNeo, Jaclyn
dc.contributor.authorRosbach, Matthias
dc.contributor.authorTischbirek, Alexander
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-06T01:47:16Z
dc.date.available2019-12-06T01:47:16Z
dc.date.issued2019-08
dc.identifier.citationNeo, Jaclyn, Rosbach, Matthias, Tischbirek, Alexander (2019-08). Solidarity in Diversity? State Responses to Religious Diversity in Liberal and Non-Liberal Perspectives. German Law Journal 16 (7) : 941-948. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2019.77
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/162586
dc.description.abstractThis Article introduces the German Law Journal’s Special Issue on “Solidarity in Diversity? State Responses to Religious Diversity in Liberal and Non-Liberal Perspectives”. The major countries in comparative focus are Germany and Singapore, both self-avowedly secular countries that face the challenge of religious diversity: Singapore, from inception, and Germany, through more recent developments. A key issue the Article raises concerns liberal approaches towards regulating religion; it argues that the liberal model,taking Germany as an example, may serve as a productive starting point for comparative analysis, as the liberal focus on individual religious freedom impacts managing religious diversity, shapes national cultural identity, models of secularism and social solidarity. This is compared with non-liberal approaches,as exemplified in Singapore practice, where a more communitarian outlook underpin more interventionist approaches whereby public interests and the common good tend to be prioritized over individual freedom. The comparative angles offered in this Special Issue is furthermore buttressed in several articles in this Special Issue that make comparisons to other jurisdictions-United States and Canada. This introductory Article offers a brief overview to the various contributions to this Special Issue and identifies unifying themes.
dc.publisherCambridge University Press
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceElements
dc.subjectLaw and Religion
dc.subjectReligious freedom
dc.subjectLiberal constitutionalism
dc.subjectNon-liberal constitutionalism
dc.subjectComparative constitutional law
dc.typeArticle
dc.date.updated2019-12-05T22:39:54Z
dc.contributor.departmentLAW
dc.description.doi10.1017/glj.2019.77
dc.description.sourcetitleGerman Law Journal
dc.description.volume16
dc.description.issue7
dc.description.page941-948
dc.description.placeUnited Kingdom
dc.published.statePublished
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
solidarity_in_diversity_state_responses_to_religious_diversity_in_liberal_and_nonliberal_perspectives.pdfPublished version149.09 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

PublishedView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons