Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117044
DC FieldValue
dc.titleAssociation between family history risk categories and prevalence of diabetes in chinese population
dc.contributor.authorZhang J.
dc.contributor.authorYang Z.
dc.contributor.authorXiao J.
dc.contributor.authorXing X.
dc.contributor.authorLu J.
dc.contributor.authorWeng J.
dc.contributor.authorJia W.
dc.contributor.authorJi L.
dc.contributor.authorShan Z.
dc.contributor.authorLiu J.
dc.contributor.authorTian H.
dc.contributor.authorJi Q.
dc.contributor.authorZhu D.
dc.contributor.authorGe J.
dc.contributor.authorChen L.
dc.contributor.authorGuo X.
dc.contributor.authorZhao Z.
dc.contributor.authorLi Q.
dc.contributor.authorZhou Z.
dc.contributor.authorLin L.
dc.contributor.authorWang N.
dc.contributor.authorYang W.
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-07T05:02:12Z
dc.date.available2019-11-07T05:02:12Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationZhang J., Yang Z., Xiao J., Xing X., Lu J., Weng J., Jia W., Ji L., Shan Z., Liu J., Tian H., Ji Q., Zhu D., Ge J., Chen L., Guo X., Zhao Z., Li Q., Zhou Z., Lin L., Wang N., Yang W. (2015). Association between family history risk categories and prevalence of diabetes in chinese population. PLoS ONE 10 (2) : e0117044. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117044
dc.identifier.issn19326203
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/161746
dc.description.abstractAim To investigate the association between different family history risk categories and prevalence of diabetes in the Chinese population. Methods The family history of diabetes was obtained from each subject, and an oral glucose tolerance test was performed for measuring the fasting and postload glucose and insulin levels based on a national representative cross-sectional survey of 46,239 individuals (age ?20 years) in the 2007-2008 China National Diabetes and Metabolism Disorders Study. The family history risk categories of diabetes were high, moderate, and average (FH2 and FH1: at least two generations and one generation of first-degree relatives with diabetes, respectively; FH0: no first-degree relatives with diabetes). Results The age- and gender-adjusted prevalence rates of diabetes were 32.7% (95% confidence interval (CI): 26.4-39.7%) in FH2, 20.1% (95% CI: 18.2- 22.1%) in FH1, and 8.4% (95% CI: 7.9-8.9%) in FH0 (P < 0.0001). The calculated homeostatic model assessment-estimated insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), Matsuda insulin sensitivity index (ISI), and insulinogenic index (?I30/ ÄG30) values showed significant trending changes among the three risk categories, with the most negative effects in FH2. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the odds ratios of having diabetes were 6.16 (95% CI: 4.46- 8.50) and 2.86 (95% CI: 2.41-3.39) times higher in FH2 and FH1, respectively, than in FH0 after adjustment for classical risk factors for diabetes. Conclusions Family history risk categories of diabetes have a significant, independent, and graded association with the prevalence of this disease in the Chinese population.. © 2015 Zhang et al.
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceUnpaywall 20191101
dc.subjectcholesterol
dc.subjectglucose
dc.subjectinsulin
dc.subjectlow density lipoprotein cholesterol
dc.subjecttriacylglycerol
dc.subjectinsulin
dc.subjectadult
dc.subjectage distribution
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectassessment of humans
dc.subjectbody mass
dc.subjectChinese
dc.subjectclassification
dc.subjectcomparative study
dc.subjectcontrolled study
dc.subjectcross-sectional study
dc.subjectdiabetes mellitus
dc.subjectdisease association
dc.subjectfamily history
dc.subjectfemale
dc.subjectfirst degree relative
dc.subjectglucose blood level
dc.subjecthigh risk population
dc.subjecthomeostatic model assessment estimated insulin resistance
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectinsulin blood level
dc.subjectinsulin release
dc.subjectinsulin resistance
dc.subjectinsulinogenic index
dc.subjectlow risk population
dc.subjectmajor clinical study
dc.subjectmale
dc.subjectMatsuda insulin sensitivity index
dc.subjectmiddle aged
dc.subjectobesity
dc.subjectonset age
dc.subjectoral glucose tolerance test
dc.subjectprevalence
dc.subjectretrospective study
dc.subjectrisk assessment
dc.subjectrisk factor
dc.subjecttrend study
dc.subjectyoung adult
dc.subjectChina
dc.subjectdiabetes mellitus
dc.subjectglucose intolerance
dc.subjectmetabolism
dc.subjectphysiology
dc.subjectpopulation
dc.subjectprevalence
dc.subjectsecretion (process)
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectChina
dc.subjectDiabetes Mellitus
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectGlucose Intolerance
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectInsulin
dc.subjectInsulin Resistance
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectPopulation
dc.subjectPrevalence
dc.subjectRisk Factors
dc.subjectYoung Adult
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentCHEMICAL & BIOMOLECULAR ENGINEERING
dc.description.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0117044
dc.description.sourcetitlePLoS ONE
dc.description.volume10
dc.description.issue2
dc.description.pagee0117044
dc.published.statePublished
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1371_journal_pone_0117044.pdf358.16 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

PublishedView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons