Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164668
DC FieldValue
dc.titleA dedicated fungal culture medium is useful in the diagnosis of fungemia: A retrospective cross-sectional study
dc.contributor.authorZheng S.
dc.contributor.authorNg T.Y.
dc.contributor.authorLi H.
dc.contributor.authorTan A.L.
dc.contributor.authorTan T.T.
dc.contributor.authorTan B.H.
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-06T07:45:26Z
dc.date.available2019-11-06T07:45:26Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationZheng S., Ng T.Y., Li H., Tan A.L., Tan T.T., Tan B.H. (2016). A dedicated fungal culture medium is useful in the diagnosis of fungemia: A retrospective cross-sectional study. PLoS ONE 11 (10) : e0164668. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164668
dc.identifier.issn19326203
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/161548
dc.description.abstractBackground: Mortality for candidemia ranges from 15% to 35%. Current guidelines recommend inoculating blood into three aerobic and three anaerobic blood culture bottles when candidemia is suspected, without mention of a fungal blood culture bottle. Objective: To determine the value of the BACTEC Myco/F Lytic blood culture media in the diagnosis of fungemia. Methods: A two-year retrospective cross-sectional study was performed for patients who had fungemia with submitted BACTEC Plus Aerobic/F (Aer), BACTEC Plus Anaerobic/F (Anaer) or Myco/F Lytic (Myco) blood culture bottles. Results: The detection rate of fungemia was 77.4% in 93 patients with contemporaneously submitted blood culture bottles when limited to only Aer/Anaer culture results. The detection rate improved significantly with the addition of the Myco culture bottle results (p<0.0001). A logistic regression model showed that Myco culture bottle submissions were less useful for patients with appropriate anti-fungal therapy administered within 48 hours [OR = 0.18, 95% CI = (0.06, 0.49), p = 0.001] and those with fungal growth detected within 48 hours [OR = 0.33, 95% CI = (0.12, 0.89), p = 0.001]. Among a subset of patients with concordant blood culture results, those with Myco culture bottles submission allowed earlier fungal detection and speciation by at least one day in 27.5% and 25.0% of the cases respectively. Conclusion: Our study highlights the importance of a dedicated fungal blood culture when fungemia is clinically suspected. Nearly a quarter of fungemias may be missed if a fungal blood culture is not performed. © 2016 Zheng et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceUnpaywall 20191101
dc.subjectantifungal agent
dc.subjectculture medium
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectblood culture
dc.subjectCandida albicans
dc.subjectCandida dubliniensis
dc.subjectCandida glabrata
dc.subjectCandida parapsilosis
dc.subjectCandida tropicalis
dc.subjectcontrolled study
dc.subjectcross-sectional study
dc.subjectCryptococcus neoformans
dc.subjectculture medium
dc.subjectfungal detection
dc.subjectfungemia
dc.subjectfungus culture
dc.subjectfungus growth
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectnonhuman
dc.subjectretrospective study
dc.subjectSaccharomyces cerevisiae
dc.subjectTrichosporon asahii
dc.subjectUstilago
dc.subjectchemistry
dc.subjectculture medium
dc.subjectfungemia
dc.subjectfungus
dc.subjecthospital laboratory
dc.subjectisolation and purification
dc.subjectlaboratory technique
dc.subjectmicrobiology
dc.subjectodds ratio
dc.subjectstandards
dc.subjectClinical Laboratory Techniques
dc.subjectCross-Sectional Studies
dc.subjectCulture Media
dc.subjectFungemia
dc.subjectFungi
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectLaboratories, Hospital
dc.subjectOdds Ratio
dc.subjectRetrospective Studies
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentDUKE-NUS MEDICAL SCHOOL
dc.contributor.departmentDEAN'S OFFICE (DUKE-NUS MEDICAL SCHOOL)
dc.description.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0164668
dc.description.sourcetitlePLoS ONE
dc.description.volume11
dc.description.issue10
dc.description.pagee0164668
dc.published.statePublished
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1371_journal_pone_0164668.pdf1.05 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons