Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.3329/bhj.v32i2.36095
DC FieldValue
dc.titleThe Effects of Perioperative Intra-aortic Balloon Counter Pulsation on Left Ventricular Function in Patients Undergoing Coronary Revascularization Surgery
dc.contributor.authorSazzad, Md Faizus
dc.contributor.authorChanda, Prasanta Kumar
dc.contributor.authorAhmed, Farooque
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-04T07:45:18Z
dc.date.available2019-11-04T07:45:18Z
dc.date.issued2017-07
dc.identifier.citationSazzad, Md Faizus, Chanda, Prasanta Kumar, Ahmed, Farooque (2017-07). The Effects of Perioperative Intra-aortic Balloon Counter Pulsation on Left Ventricular Function in Patients Undergoing Coronary Revascularization Surgery. Bangladesh Heart Journal 32 (2) : 94-99. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.3329/bhj.v32i2.36095
dc.identifier.issn10248714
dc.identifier.issn25213113
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/161369
dc.description.abstract<jats:p>Intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) is the most common mechanical assist device used for the treatment of low cardiac output in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Despite recent advancement in cardiac surgery the overall mortality in patients receiving perioperative IABP remains high. In most cases the patient has poor Left ventricular (LV) function, diastolic dysfunction, recent myocardial infarction with septal rupture, heart failure and/or cardiogenic shock receiving an IABP counterpulsation support. Unfortunately patients with preserved LV function may also require IABP support to wean from cardio pulmonary bypass due to post-surgical myocardial dysfunction. This hospital-based prospective observational study evaluated 60 patients, who underwent CABG, divided into two groups. Left ventricular ejection fraction was 56.93± 7.666 in Group A compared to 41.50± 6.735 in Group B. When compared with the corresponding preoperative ejection fraction both the group found to have improved ejection fraction among the survivors at three months. Left ventricular end diastolic diameter and end systolic diameter was also found improved in both the groups (53.15± 3.231mm vs 59.47± 4.200mm and 41.52± 2.847mm vs 44.47± 3.636mm respectively). No significant difference was observed in terms of 30days mortality and postoperative outcome. Given its survival benefit, surgeons must use IABP in a pre-planned way. Here by we recommend that the use of risk prediction score for patient undergoing coronary revascularization surgery is useful.Bangladesh Heart Journal 2017; 32(2) : 94-99</jats:p>
dc.publisherBangladesh Journals Online (JOL)
dc.sourceElements
dc.typeArticle
dc.date.updated2019-11-04T07:12:17Z
dc.contributor.departmentSURGERY
dc.description.doi10.3329/bhj.v32i2.36095
dc.description.sourcetitleBangladesh Heart Journal
dc.description.volume32
dc.description.issue2
dc.description.page94-99
dc.published.statePublished
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
7. IABP_BHJ_2017.pdfPublished version141.56 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

PublishedView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.