Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189687
DC FieldValue
dc.titleUsing best-worst scaling choice experiments to elicit the most important domains of health for health-related quality of life in Singapore
dc.contributor.authorUy E.J.
dc.contributor.authorBautista D.C.
dc.contributor.authorXin X.
dc.contributor.authorCheung Y.B.
dc.contributor.authorThio S.-T.
dc.contributor.authorThumboo J.
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-01T08:17:07Z
dc.date.available2019-11-01T08:17:07Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationUy E.J., Bautista D.C., Xin X., Cheung Y.B., Thio S.-T., Thumboo J. (2018). Using best-worst scaling choice experiments to elicit the most important domains of health for health-related quality of life in Singapore. PLoS ONE 13 (2) : e0189687. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189687
dc.identifier.issn19326203
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/161237
dc.description.abstractHealth-related quality of life (HRQOL) instruments are sometimes used without explicit understanding of which HRQOL domains are important to a given population. In this study, we sought to elicit an importance hierarchy among 27 HRQOL domains (derived from the general population) via a best-worst scaling survey of the population in Singapore, and to determine whether these domains were consistently valued across gender, age, ethnicity, and presence of chronic illnesses. We conducted a community-based study that sampled participants with quotas for gender, ethnicity, age, presence of chronic illness, and interview language. For the best-worst scaling exercise, we constructed comparison sets according to a balanced incomplete block design resulting in 13 sets of questions, each with nine choice tasks. Each task involved three HRQOL domains from which participants identified the most and least important domain. We performed a standard analysis of best-worst object scaling design (Case 1) using simple summary statistics; 603 residents participated in the survey. The three most important domains of health were: “the ability to take care of self without help from others” (best-worst score (BWS): 636), “healing and resistance to illness” (BWS: 461), and “having good relationships with family, friends, and others” (BWS: 373). The 10 top-ranked domains included physical, mental, and social health. The three least important domains were: “having a satisfying sex life” (BWS: -803), “having normal physical appearance” (BWS: -461), and “interacting with others (talking, shared activities, etc.)” (BWS: -444). Generally, top-ranked domains were consistently valued across gender, age, ethnicity, and presence of chronic illness. We conclude that the 10 top-ranked domains reflect physical, mental, and social dimensions of well-being suggesting that the sampled population’s views on health are consistent with the World Health Organization’s definition of health, “a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity”. Copyright: © 2018 Uy et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceUnpaywall 20191101
dc.subjectadult
dc.subjectage
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectbest worst scaling survey
dc.subjectchronic disease
dc.subjectcross-sectional study
dc.subjectethnicity
dc.subjectfemale
dc.subjectgender
dc.subjecthealth
dc.subjecthealth survey
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjecthuman relation
dc.subjectIndian
dc.subjectmale
dc.subjectmental health
dc.subjectphysical appearance
dc.subjectphysical resistance
dc.subjectpopulation research
dc.subjectquality of life
dc.subjectquality of life assessment
dc.subjectself care
dc.subjectsexual satisfaction
dc.subjectSingapore
dc.subjectsocial health
dc.subjectsocial interaction
dc.subjectstatistical analysis
dc.subjectwellbeing
dc.subjectlinguistics
dc.subjectmiddle aged
dc.subjectquality of life
dc.subjectquestionnaire
dc.subjectyoung adult
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectCross-Sectional Studies
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectLinguistics
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectQuality of Life
dc.subjectSingapore
dc.subjectSurveys and Questionnaires
dc.subjectYoung Adult
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentDUKE-NUS MEDICAL SCHOOL
dc.contributor.departmentDEAN'S OFFICE (DUKE-NUS MEDICAL SCHOOL)
dc.contributor.departmentMEDICINE
dc.description.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0189687
dc.description.sourcetitlePLoS ONE
dc.description.volume13
dc.description.issue2
dc.description.pagee0189687
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1371_journal_pone_0189687.pdf1 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons