Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9101075
DC FieldValue
dc.titleUsability study to assess the IGBP land cover classification for Singapore
dc.contributor.authorSidhu N.
dc.contributor.authorPebesma E.
dc.contributor.authorWang Y.-C.
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-25T06:32:32Z
dc.date.available2019-03-25T06:32:32Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationSidhu N., Pebesma E., Wang Y.-C. (2017). Usability study to assess the IGBP land cover classification for Singapore. Remote Sensing 9 (10) : 1075. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9101075
dc.identifier.issn20724292
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/152622
dc.description.abstractOur research focuses on assessing the usability of the International Geosphere Biosphere Programme (IGBP) classification scheme provided in the MODIS MCD12Q1-1 dataset for assessing the land cover of the city-state, Singapore. We conducted a user study with responses from 33 users by providing them with Google Earth images from different parts of Singapore, asking survey-takers to classify these images according to their understanding by the IGBP definitions provided. We also conducted interviews with experts from major governmental agencies working with satellite imagery, which highlighted the need for a detailed land classification for Singapore. In addition to the qualitative analysis of the IGBP land classification scheme, we carried out a validation of the MCD12Q1-1 remote sensing product against SPOT-5 imagery for our study area. The user study revealed that survey-takers were able to correctly classify urban areas, as well as densely forested areas. Misclassifications between Cropland and Mixed Forest classes were highest and were attributed by users to the broad terminology of the IGBP of the two land cover class definitions. For the accuracy assessment, we obtained validation points using weighted and unweighted stratified sampling. The overall classification accuracy for all 17 IGBP land classes is 62%. Upon selecting only the four most occurring IGBP land classes in Singapore, the classification accuracy improved to 71%. Validation of the MCD12Q1-1 against ground truth for Singapore revealed less-common land classes that may be of importance in a global context but are sources of error when the same product is applied at a smaller scale. Combining the user study with the accuracy assessment gives a comprehensive overview of the challenges associated with using global-level land cover data to derive localized land cover information specifically for smaller land masses like Singapore. © 2017 by the authors.
dc.publisherMDPI AG
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectGlobal classification; Land cover classification; MODIS; User study; Validation
dc.typeNote
dc.contributor.departmentGEOGRAPHY
dc.description.doi10.3390/rs9101075
dc.description.sourcetitleRemote Sensing
dc.description.volume9
dc.description.issue10
dc.description.page1075
dc.published.statepublished
dc.grant.idR109-000-190-646
dc.grant.idDAAD Kairo
dc.grant.idDAAD
dc.grant.fundingagencyNUS, National University of Singapore
dc.grant.fundingagencyDeutscher Akademischer Austausch Dienst Kairo
dc.grant.fundingagencyDeutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
rs9101075.pdf1.17 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.