Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjinnov-2017-000210
DC FieldValue
dc.titleCharacterisation of the aortic pulse profile of a radial artery applanation tonometry device in patients with aortic stenosis
dc.contributor.authorNgiam N.
dc.contributor.authorShen X.
dc.contributor.authorTan B.Y.-Q.
dc.contributor.authorOinuma S.
dc.contributor.authorLee G.K.
dc.contributor.authorKong W.K.
dc.contributor.authorPoh K.-K.
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-26T01:08:21Z
dc.date.available2019-02-26T01:08:21Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationNgiam N., Shen X., Tan B.Y.-Q., Oinuma S., Lee G.K., Kong W.K., Poh K.-K. (2018). Characterisation of the aortic pulse profile of a radial artery applanation tonometry device in patients with aortic stenosis. BMJ Innovations 4 (1) : 24-28. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjinnov-2017-000210
dc.identifier.issn20558074
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/151787
dc.description.abstractBackground Aortic stenosis (AS) is commonly associated with myocardial and systemic arterial dysfunction. We use a radial artery applanation tonometry (B-Pro) device to characterise the arterial pulse profile of patients with AS and compare them against controls. Methods The B-Pro device was applied on the left radial artery of 117 consecutive patients, where 21 patients had AS. Baseline clinical and echocardiographic characteristics were compared. Differences in arterial pulse pressure profile were quantified by means of univariate and multivariable analyses. Results The group with AS was older (74ñ14 vs 62ñ14 years, P<0.001) and had fewer males (38% vs 65%, P=0.025), while other baseline comorbidities were similar. From the arterial pulse profile, a higher systolic peak time (202ñ45 vs 152ñ49 ms, P<0.001), lower systolic upstroke gradient (0.35ñ0.10 vs 0.42ñ0.14 mm Hg/ms, P=0.022) and longer systolic component of the cardiac cycle (43%ñ7% vs 39%ñ5%, P=0.001) were independently associated with AS. Conclusion The B-Pro device allows for real-time microscopic arterial pulse waveform analysis. There are significant differences between the pulse profiles of patients with AS and controls. The prognostic implications of these differences warrant further study. ? Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Group
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectaortic stenosis
dc.subjectpulse wave reflection
dc.subjectradial applanation tonometry
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentYONG LOO LIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
dc.description.doi10.1136/bmjinnov-2017-000210
dc.description.sourcetitleBMJ Innovations
dc.description.volume4
dc.description.issue1
dc.description.page24-28
dc.published.statepublished
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
bmjinnov-2017-000210.pdf261.59 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.