Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.9397
DC FieldValue
dc.titleMeasuring Engagement in eHealth and mHealth Behavior Change Interventions: Viewpoint of Methodologies
dc.contributor.authorShort, Camille E
dc.contributor.authorDeSmet, Ann
dc.contributor.authorWoods, Catherine
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, Susan L
dc.contributor.authorMaher, Carol
dc.contributor.authorMiddelweerd, Anouk
dc.contributor.authorAndre Matthias Mueller
dc.contributor.authorWark, Petra A
dc.contributor.authorVandelanotte, Corneel
dc.contributor.authorPoppe, Louise
dc.contributor.authorHingle, Melanie D
dc.contributor.authorCrutzen, Rik
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-21T04:20:13Z
dc.date.available2018-11-21T04:20:13Z
dc.date.issued2018-11-16
dc.identifier.citationShort, Camille E, DeSmet, Ann, Woods, Catherine, Williams, Susan L, Maher, Carol, Middelweerd, Anouk, Andre Matthias Mueller, Wark, Petra A, Vandelanotte, Corneel, Poppe, Louise, Hingle, Melanie D, Crutzen, Rik (2018-11-16). Measuring Engagement in eHealth and mHealth Behavior Change Interventions: Viewpoint of Methodologies. Journal of Medical Internet Research 20 (11). ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.9397
dc.identifier.issn14388871
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/148863
dc.description.abstractEngagement in electronic health (eHealth) and mobile health (mHealth) behavior change interventions is thought to be important for intervention effectiveness, though what constitutes engagement and how it enhances efficacy has been somewhat unclear in the literature. Recently published detailed definitions and conceptual models of engagement have helped to build consensus around a definition of engagement and improve our understanding of how engagement may influence effectiveness. This work has helped to establish a clearer research agenda. However, to test the hypotheses generated by the conceptual modules, we need to know how to measure engagement in a valid and reliable way. The aim of this viewpoint is to provide an overview of engagement measurement options that can be employed in eHealth and mHealth behavior change intervention evaluations, discuss methodological considerations, and provide direction for future research. To identify measures, we used snowball sampling, starting from systematic reviews of engagement research as well as those utilized in studies known to the authors. A wide range of methods to measure engagement were identified, including qualitative measures, self-report questionnaires, ecological momentary assessments, system usage data, sensor data, social media data, and psychophysiological measures. Each measurement method is appraised and examples are provided to illustrate possible use in eHealth and mHealth behavior change research. Recommendations for future research are provided, based on the limitations of current methods and the heavy reliance on system usage data as the sole assessment of engagement. The validation and adoption of a wider range of engagement measurements and their thoughtful application to the study of engagement are encouraged.
dc.description.urihttps://www.jmir.org/2018/11/e292/
dc.language.isoen
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.subjectevaluation studies
dc.subjecthealth promotion
dc.subjectinternet
dc.subjectoutcome and process assessment (health care)
dc.subjecttelemedicine
dc.subjecttreatment adherence and compliance
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentSAW SWEE HOCK SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
dc.description.doi10.2196/jmir.9397
dc.description.sourcetitleJournal of Medical Internet Research
dc.description.volume20
dc.description.issue11
dc.published.statePublished
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
Short_engagement_2018.pdf592.8 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

PublishedView/Download
Appendix 1.xlsx35.05 kBMicrosoft Excel XML

OPEN

NoneView/Download
Appendix 2.pdf78.52 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download
Appendix 3.pdf50.99 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons