Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/134318
DC FieldValue
dc.titleThe classification of gestational trophoblastic disease: A critical review
dc.contributor.authorTham, K.F.
dc.contributor.authorRatnam, S.S.
dc.date.accessioned2016-12-20T08:45:53Z
dc.date.available2016-12-20T08:45:53Z
dc.date.issued1998
dc.identifier.citationTham, K.F., Ratnam, S.S. (1998). The classification of gestational trophoblastic disease: A critical review. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics 60 (SUPPL.1) : S39-S49. ScholarBank@NUS Repository.
dc.identifier.issn00207292
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/134318
dc.description.abstractGestational trophoblastic disease defines a group of conditions which arises from the fetal chorion. Two of the most important advances in the management of gestational trophoblastic disease have been the standardisation of terminology, and the concept of risk assignment based on classification or staging systems which allows rationalisation of treatment. Gestational trophoblastic disease is unique as the prognosis is dependent not only on the anatomic extent but also the presence of prognostic factors. A staging system similar to that used for other cancers does not apply to this disease because in most cases diagnosis is bases not on histology but on clinical or biochemical parameters. Metastatic spread to distant organs can occur early, even in the absence of disease in the uterus or pelvis. Staging in gestational trophoblastic disease must include prognostic factors in addition to anatomic extent of disease. Broadly there are two categories of classification in current use. The first is based on the usual staging system as in other cancers, with four stages of disease, but at the same time prognostic factors are incorporated. This has the important advantages of simplicity and uniformity with other staging systems. However the main pitfall is that no recommendations are made for treatment. The other broad category consists of risk tables, based on anatomic spread as well as prognostic factors. Here patients are assigned varying risk scores, with guidelines for multiagent chemotherapy at the outset in high-risk patients to minimise drug resistant disease. The ideal system would be one which has four stages of disease, so that comparison is easier, with recommendations for combination chemotherapy beyond a certain stage of disease.
dc.subjectClassification
dc.subjectGestational
dc.subjectTrophoblastic
dc.subjectTumours
dc.typeReview
dc.contributor.departmentOBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY
dc.description.sourcetitleInternational Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics
dc.description.volume60
dc.description.issueSUPPL.1
dc.description.pageS39-S49
dc.description.codenIJGOA
dc.identifier.isiutNOT_IN_WOS
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Page view(s)

20
checked on May 17, 2019

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.